On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> `master` and `runner` are a bit more problematic because they are pretty handy
> as separate commands. I don't think they belong under `bin/mailman` and since
> they're of internal use only, I would never expect them to be installed into
> /
On Jul 10, 2011, at 11:07 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>I was looking at Mailman 3 to see how many of the Indymedia patches
>for Mailman 2 would be still needed.
>
>The first thing that struck me was how generic the files that were
>installed in $PATH. I would really recommend mm-master, mm-runner,
>mm-on
Hi all,
I was looking at Mailman 3 to see how many of the Indymedia patches
for Mailman 2 would be still needed.
The first thing that struck me was how generic the files that were
installed in $PATH. I would really recommend mm-master, mm-runner,
mm-onebounce or similar instead of the current mas
