On Tuesday 23 April 2002 06:02 pm, you wrote:
> >> A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad
> >> enough, but
> >
> > Jeez, chuq, where have you been? I've been dealing with klez for
> > *months*. Our central scanners nail about 1,400 of them *a day*.
>
> This is a new variant
At 03:02 PM 4/23/02 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> >> A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad enough, but
> >
> > Jeez, chuq, where have you been? I've been dealing with klez for
> > *months*. Our central scanners nail about 1,400 of them *a day*.
>
>This is a new variant
>> A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad enough, but
>
> Jeez, chuq, where have you been? I've been dealing with klez for
> *months*. Our central scanners nail about 1,400 of them *a day*.
This is a new variant, not the old Klez. And it's getting worse.
--
Chuq Von Ro
At 10:07 AM 4/23/02 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>Passing this along, because this has implications to list owners.
>
>A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad enough, but
Jeez, chuq, where have you been? I've been dealing with klez for
*months*. Our central scanners nai
At 10:07 AM 23/04/02 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>This is an emerging worm, and it looks pretty ugly. It has hit Hong Kong and
>Great Britain worst so far, but it's spreading rapidly accordind to people
>I've talked to.
I have to say, I've seen it already quite a bit on some of the linuxchix
Passing this along, because this has implications to list owners.
A new emerging worm is out there in windows land. That's bad enough, but
this one has the hack that instead of repropogating via email using the
owners email address, it repropogates using a random address in the infected
machine'
