Re: [Mailman-Developers] Possible bug in marilman arch when doing incremental archiving

2013-12-18 Thread fc lists
Thanks a lot for this :) I will take a look at your fix and most likely import that in my mailman package ... other then anything, i would prefer to have something mantained upstream so i don't have to patch my package every time i upgrade. On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Possible bug in marilman arch when doing incremental archiving

2013-12-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 12/13/2013 02:57 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > Thank you for the report. I have created > for this issue. > > I think your fix is OK, but I am inclined to set the factory while > skipping to the start to Mailman.Mailbox._safeparser rather than the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Possible bug in marilman arch when doing incremental archiving

2013-12-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 12/13/2013 05:06 AM, fc lists wrote: > > When the start is higher then counter, to iterate over the mailbox and get > to the starting point requested, the *next()* method on the mbox object is > called which trigger the archfactory which extract the attachment from > messages that were already

[Mailman-Developers] Possible bug in marilman arch when doing incremental archiving

2013-12-13 Thread fc lists
Hi, I think i encountered a bug for mailman *arch* process when doing incremental archiving out of band from mbox file. I am running mailman-2.1.9 (working on upgrading to 2.1.17 ... but if i got this right it is still present in that version) For various reasons i need to run my Archiving out of