Re: [Mailman-Developers] Postorius and MRs for 3.1

2017-05-24 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 24, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: >Don't worry I'll do the releasing of HyperKitty when Mailman is up. Thanks! >However, I have just found two rather simple bugs: >- https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/336 >- https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/337 > >I have set t

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Postorius and MRs for 3.1

2017-05-24 Thread Aurelien Bompard
Thanks Barry! Don't worry I'll do the releasing of HyperKitty when Mailman is up. However, I have just found two rather simple bugs: - https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/336 - https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/337 I have set the 3.1 milestone on them, and I think the 1st one should

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Postorius and MRs for 3.1

2017-05-23 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 23, 2017, at 06:09 PM, Terri Oda wrote: >Your turn for the "last chance to tag things for 3.1" email now that >Aurelien's weighed in. ;) (I'm cc'ing the rest of mailman-developers in case >anyone else wants to advocate for a bug too...) I uploaded Core 3.1rc1 to PyPI this afternoon, so bar

[Mailman-Developers] Postorius and MRs for 3.1

2017-05-23 Thread Terri Oda
Hi Florian, Your turn for the "last chance to tag things for 3.1" email now that Aurelien's weighed in. ;) (I'm cc'ing the rest of mailman-developers in case anyone else wants to advocate for a bug too...) I *think* we've got 3.1 tagged appropriately, which means that the unicode bug is the