Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On 03/29/2012 02:51 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Okay. I have to figure out why the consensus is that I am running django 1.4 while I actually installed 1.3.1: Just for the record, the reason we suspect Django 1.4 conflicts is that the link you posted with the errors

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

Hi Odhiambo, Am 29.03.12 18:12, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: > My issue here is that I am not running Django 1.4 - unless I am missing > something. I am not sure where it is coming from. > I am on FreeBSD and I installed django-1.3.1 from the ports. A check on my > installed apps shows just that.

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 13:53, Florian Fuchs wrote: > Hi, > > there seems to be a general problem running postorius with Django 1.4. > > Postorius alpha1 was released the same day Django 1.4 was, so we haven't > had anyone on the team so far who was running 1.4 while working on > postorius. > > @

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

Hi, there seems to be a general problem running postorius with Django 1.4. Postorius alpha1 was released the same day Django 1.4 was, so we haven't had anyone on the team so far who was running 1.4 while working on postorius. @Shayan, could you file a bug on https://launchpad.net/postorius and p

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:12, Shayan Md wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Odhiambo Washington > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:33, Shayan Md wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Odhiambo Washington < >>> odhia...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, M

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:33, Shayan Md wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Odhiambo Washington > > wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 22:31, Florian Fuchs wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Odhiambo, >>> > >>> > Am 28.03.12

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:33, Shayan Md wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Odhiambo Washington > > wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 22:31, Florian Fuchs wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Odhiambo, >>> > >>> > Am 28.03.12

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:33, Shayan Md wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Odhiambo Washington > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 22:31, Florian Fuchs wrote: >> >> > Hi Odhiambo, >> > >> > Am 28.03.12 18:47, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: >> > > One more thing: >> > > >> > > In se

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 22:31, Florian Fuchs wrote: > > > Hi Odhiambo, > > > > Am 28.03.12 18:47, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: > > > One more thing: > > > > > > In settings.py, I have this: > > > > > > REST_SERVER = 'http://192.168.40

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 22:31, Florian Fuchs wrote: > Hi Odhiambo, > > Am 28.03.12 18:47, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: > > One more thing: > > > > In settings.py, I have this: > > > > REST_SERVER = 'http://192.168.40.252:8001' > > > > However, this doesn't seem to be respected when I do runserver

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 22:31, Florian Fuchs wrote: > Hi Odhiambo, > > Am 28.03.12 18:47, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: > > One more thing: > > > > In settings.py, I have this: > > > > REST_SERVER = 'http://192.168.40.252:8001' > > > > However, this doesn't seem to be respected when I do runserver

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

Hi Odhiambo, Am 28.03.12 18:47, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: > One more thing: > > In settings.py, I have this: > > REST_SERVER = 'http://192.168.40.252:8001' > > However, this doesn't seem to be respected when I do runserver: > > [root@jaribu] /usr/home/wash/Tools/Mailman/MM3/postorius/dev_se

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 20:03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Odhiambo Washington > wrote: > > > However, I am lost as to why the argument to this procedure was named > > "syncdb" and not "createdb", which is what it's doing. Can you explain > that > > please? Sorry

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > However, I am lost as to why the argument to this procedure was named > "syncdb" and not "createdb", which is what it's doing. Can you explain that > please? Sorry, I am a noob in this. It's called "syncdb" because it synchronizes the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 19:40, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 19:13, Florian Fuchs wrote: > >> Hi Odhiambo, >> >> Am 28.03.12 17:13, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: >> > Hey Jeff and all, >> > >> > I followed the "five minute guide", but I am hitting a brickwall: >> > >> >

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 19:13, Florian Fuchs wrote: > Hi Odhiambo, > > Am 28.03.12 17:13, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: > > Hey Jeff and all, > > > > I followed the "five minute guide", but I am hitting a brickwall: > > > > [root@jaribu] /usr/home/wash/Tools/Mailman/MM3/postorius/dev_setup# > pyth

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

Hi Odhiambo, Am 28.03.12 17:13, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: > Hey Jeff and all, > > I followed the "five minute guide", but I am hitting a brickwall: > > [root@jaribu] /usr/home/wash/Tools/Mailman/MM3/postorius/dev_setup# python > manage.py syncdb > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 00:34, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Congratulations! I was able to get Postorius running by following the > five minute quick start guide. I didn't see archiving settings in the > user interface, how do I set that up? > > Hey Jeff and all, I followed the "five minute guide"

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Mar 23, 2012, at 11:47 PM, Felipe Gasper wrote: > >>No INSTALL file in the tarball? > The online documentation is here: > > http://packages.python.org/mailman/README.html > > but I admit that the "Getting Started" page is a little bit out

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Mar 25, 2012, at 02:34 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: >Congratulations! I was able to get Postorius running by following the >five minute quick start guide. I didn't see archiving settings in the >user interface, how do I set that up? As Mark described, mm3 actually has a nicer architecture for a

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Mar 26, 2012, at 04:11 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote: >Great news Barry, but just one thing, I checked now on list.org and the GNU >Mailman website and there is no mention of this release.. is that on purpose? Not really. The server moved recently and my keys hadn't been installed. Looks like they

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Mar 23, 2012, at 11:47 PM, Felipe Gasper wrote: >No INSTALL file in the tarball? > >For folks like me who aren’t savvy with Python’s installers and were >expecting to find configure/make, it would help a great deal. > >This may be the wrong list for this, but just in case I stumbled on the righ

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On 03/24/2012 02:00 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: Hello Mailman enthusiasts! Use the key, unlock the door See what your fate might have in store... Building on the excitement and amazing progress at our sprints at Pycon 2012, I am very happy to announce the availability of GNU Mailman 3.0 b

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

Congratulations! I was able to get Postorius running by following the five minute quick start guide. I didn't see archiving settings in the user interface, how do I set that up? Cheers, Jeff ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.o

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Hello Mailman enthusiasts! > I'm also ecstatic to announce the first alpha release of Postorius, our new > official name for the Django-based Mailman 3 web user interface.  The name was > suggested by core developer Florian Fuchs in honor of

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On 3/23/2012 9:47 PM, Felipe Gasper wrote: > No INSTALL file in the tarball? > > For folks like me who aren’t savvy with Python’s installers and were > expecting to find configure/make, it would help a great deal. > > > This may be the wrong list for this, but just in case I stumbled on the > ri

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

No INSTALL file in the tarball? For folks like me who aren’t savvy with Python’s installers and were expecting to find configure/make, it would help a great deal. This may be the wrong list for this, but just in case I stumbled on the right way to install it, I got this when doing sudo pytho

Re: [Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:00 PM, "Barry Warsaw" wrote: > Use the key, unlock the door >See what your fate might have in store... Everybody walk the dinosaur! Seriously though, this is amazing news! Thanks to everyone who helped work on this. I can't wait to give it a try! Cheers, Justin _

[Mailman-Developers] RELEASED: GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1 and Postorius 1.0 alpha 1

Hello Mailman enthusiasts! Use the key, unlock the door See what your fate might have in store... Building on the excitement and amazing progress at our sprints at Pycon 2012, I am very happy to announce the availability of GNU Mailman 3.0 beta 1, code named "The Twilight Zone". After ne