On 3/13/19 11:18 PM, aaryan bhagat wrote:
> I beleive I have understood.
> We can process the events registered and call for the necessary action
> (unsubscribing , send warning mail etc) it will not affect the other
> runners.
>
> Am I missing something?
> Provide some pointers on this please.
I beleive I have understood.
We can process the events registered and call for the necessary action
(unsubscribing , send warning mail etc) it will not affect the other
runners.
Am I missing something?
Provide some pointers on this please.
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, 11:45 aaryan bhagat, wrote:
> Ok,
Ok, thanks for the clarification
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, 11:44 Mark Sapiro, wrote:
> On 3/13/19 10:41 PM, aaryan bhagat wrote:
> > The events when stored. I do not think their processing for removing an
> > address effects the other runners so we can focus on a detailed handling
> > of registered
The events when stored. I do not think their processing for removing an
address effects the other runners so we can focus on a detailed handling of
registered msg.
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, 11:08 aaryan bhagat, wrote:
> I want to ask whether they are independent or not we can define the
> complexity
I want to ask whether they are independent or not we can define the
complexity of our processing upon its dependence on other processes.
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, 11:06 Mark Sapiro, wrote:
> On 3/13/19 12:36 PM, Aaryan Bhagat wrote:
> >
> > Given a list of registered bounce events in queue for
On 3/13/19 12:36 PM, Aaryan Bhagat wrote:
>
> Given a list of registered bounce events in queue for processing. Does their
> processing time/method affect the other operations ( other runners especially
> ) of the server.
Currently there is no processing of registered bounce events.
