--On 25 January 2007 10:48:52 +0100 Joachim Breitner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently, Joe would get N messages telling him that he is not
> subscribed. If he marks these as spam we get the same result, don’t we?
> Thus adding a “self-approve mail” link or a “subscribe” link to
> this m
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 24.01.2007, 20:13 -0500 schrieb Dan MacNeil:
> Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Alternatively, a message to a members-only mailing list could
> > automatically trigger a subscribe challenge that, if acted upon, not
> > only subscribes the sender, but also approves the held-back mes
> Am Mittwoch, den 24.01.2007, 20:13 -0500 schrieb Dan MacNeil:
>> Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>> Alternatively, a message to a members-only mailing list could
>>> automatically trigger a subscribe challenge that, if acted upon, not
>>> only subscribes the sender, but also approves the held-back messa
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Alternatively, a message to a members-only mailing list could
> automatically trigger a subscribe challenge that, if acted upon, not
> only subscribes the sender, but also approves the held-back message.
I often miss stuff but near as I can tell this would be a bad thing.
--On 22 January 2007 22:42:11 +0100 Joachim Breitner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a lot of mailing lists have posting only available to members just to
> prevent spam. For these lists there should be an option that adds a link
> to the „Your message is held...“ notification that will
Hello,
a lot of mailing lists have posting only available to members just to
prevent spam. For these lists there should be an option that adds a link
to the „Your message is held...“ notification that will allow the
message to go through, just like the link to delete it, or the check in
the subscr
