Alessandro Vesely writes:
> Yes, RDAP is WHOIS with a machine-readable format. In both cases,
> a name retrieved from a public domain name registry (DNR) is an
> "organizational" domain.
Yes, but my understanding of the discussions on the DMARC list leading
to use of the PSL in RFC 7843 is th
In article you write:
>Hi all,
>* The specs say that "DMARC should be amended to use [a method better than PSL]
>as soon as it is generally available" [1]. I believe that sentence refers to
>RDAP, which was released more or less at the same time (March 2015) [2].
Sorry, that is wrong. It was re
On Thu 02/Nov/2017 03:31:46 +0100 Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Alessandro Vesely writes:
>
>> * The specs say that "DMARC should be amended to use [a method
>> better than PSL] as soon as it is generally available" [1]. I
>> believe that sentence refers to RDAP, which was released more or
>> less
Alessandro Vesely writes:
> * The specs say that "DMARC should be amended to use [a method
> better than PSL] as soon as it is generally available" [1]. I
> believe that sentence refers to RDAP, which was released more or
> less at the same time (March 2015) [2].
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf
Hi all,
I noticed (from a DMARC mitigation utility that Lindsay extracted) that Mailman
features its own approach to using the PSL. Of course, development must go on,
and sometimes it is a waste of time trying to make a super-duper scaffolding
for a job that can be carried out complying to the KIS
