Re: [Mailman-Developers] What characters should be allowed in listnames

2017-02-19 Thread SM
Hi Stephen, At 10:12 PM 2/18/2017, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: The problem that I thought we may face is internationalized mailboxes and domain names *are still ASCII* which encodes Unicode. OK, I looked it up, and I was almost certainly wrong. The relevant RFCs are actually 6531 (SMTPUTF8

Re: [Mailman-Developers] What characters should be allowed in listnames

2017-02-18 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark Sapiro writes: > That doesn't really address my question. That has to do with > internationalized email addresses. Granted the listname must be a valid > local part of an email address, but that doesn't mean every valid local > part has to be a valid list name. The problem that I

Re: [Mailman-Developers] What characters should be allowed in listnames

2017-02-14 Thread Terri Oda
On February 15, 2017 8:03:33 AM GMT+05:30, Mark Sapiro wrote: >On 02/14/2017 10:52 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> Mark Sapiro writes: >> >> > I'd like feedback on this. What are your thoughts on what >characters >> > should be allowed in list names? >> >> Uh, RFC 6532

Re: [Mailman-Developers] What characters should be allowed in listnames

2017-02-14 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 02/14/2017 10:52 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark Sapiro writes: > > > I'd like feedback on this. What are your thoughts on what characters > > should be allowed in list names? > > Uh, RFC 6532 That doesn't really address my question. That has to do with internationalized email

[Mailman-Developers] What characters should be allowed in listnames

2017-02-14 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark Sapiro writes: > I'd like feedback on this. What are your thoughts on what characters > should be allowed in list names? Uh, RFC 6532 Probably that can wait for when we actually support it :-), but while you're doing this we should (= I should when life gets sane ;-) make sure that

Re: [Mailman-Developers] What characters should be allowed in listnames

2017-02-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 02/12/2017 05:27 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > Certainly some narrowing is appropriate. We could just clamp it down as you > suggest, understanding that there may already be lists in existence that use > the more liberal character set, and acknowledging that we may want to relax > the set based

Re: [Mailman-Developers] What characters should be allowed in listnames

2017-02-12 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 12, 2017, at 03:58 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >Core validates listnames by ensuring the fqdn_listname is a valid email >address. This is too liberal. RFC 5321 allows many characters in the >local part of a list name. We don't allow quite all of them, but we >allow this set