Re: [Mailman-Developers] comments on mailman2.1a3

2001-10-25 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "B" == Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: B> ANother thing you might want to fix in the docs is the order of B> installation. B> For example, it tells you how to install mailman, then talks B> about the postfix MTA thing. I had to go back and ./configure B> again using

Re: [Mailman-Developers] comments on mailman2.1a3

2001-10-25 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Barry, ANother thing you might want to fix in the docs is the order of installation. For example, it tells you how to install mailman, then talks about the postfix MTA thing. I had to go back and ./configure again using the recommendation there. Bob ___

Re: [Mailman-Developers] comments on mailman2.1a3

2001-10-25 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "KPC" == Kaja P Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KPC> - after the installation of email package, the test - as KPC> recommended by INSTALL - returns email.__version__ 0.92 (and KPC> not 0.93). Yep, I forgot to update that. Fixed in email-0.94 KPC> - no problems w

[Mailman-Developers] comments on mailman2.1a3

2001-10-25 Thread Kaja P. Christiansen
Thanks for all new stuff in mailman2.1a3; it looks really good. I installed it ~mailman2 and on a different web server than our production version. Here are a few comments: - after the installation of email package, the test - as recommended by INSTALL - returns email.__version__ 0.92 (and