On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 01:17:24AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6693&group_id=1
> (second paragraph of "So what does this mean for the list users?"
I will.
> > If I was on a list, and got copies of messages to me that were *not*
> > also carbone
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:41:04AM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 08:33:44AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > > What problem are you trying to tackle?
> >
> > People who are trying to set reply-to munging because they don't want
> > receipients to receive two copies
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 08:33:44AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > What problem are you trying to tackle?
>
> People who are trying to set reply-to munging because they don't want
> receipients to receive two copies of the posts. While the solution is bad,
> the initial need is real.
> (we
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:40:31AM +0800, Mark Tearle wrote:
> Mine attacks the problem by enabling lists to be set up which
> can pull there membership in from other lists.
> (ie at the who is on the list stage of the pipeline)
I looked at your patch closer and you're right. Sorry for the
misun
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> There were two patches sent here, by Ben Gertzfield and Mark Tearle.
>
> Was one of the two integrated in mailman CVS?
>
> If not, any recommendations on which one I should look at today and Barry,
> if you're reading, whether you're planning to put one i
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> There were two patches sent here, by Ben Gertzfield and Mark
MM> Tearle.
MM> Was one of the two integrated in mailman CVS?
MM> If not, any recommendations on which one I should look at
MM> today and Barry, if you're
There were two patches sent here, by Ben Gertzfield and Mark Tearle.
Was one of the two integrated in mailman CVS?
If not, any recommendations on which one I should look at today and Barry,
if you're reading, whether you're planning to put one in for 2.1 or if this
will wait for a later release?
