> "MC" == Mentor Cana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MC> Has anyone installed 2.1b1 on top of 2.0.8? I'm tempted to do
MC> so and I would appreciate any first hand experience.
I have, but only for some test lists.
MC> Is this recommended or is it prefered that we install 2.1b1 in
At 12:54 PM 3/18/02 -0500, Mentor Cana wrote:
>However, my current 2.1b1 was an incremental upgrade from the CVS every few
>days, starting with pre 2.1a4. So, hopefully going directly from 2.0.8 to
>2.1b1 will not be a problem. Yeh, we have to be carefull about all the
I've done large cvs jumps
Thanks for the e-mail. I have already installed 2.1b1 in a separate
location (both version 2.0.8 and 2.1b1 working just fine). However, my
current 2.1b1 installation is a test instalation only. That's where I test
my CVSs before installing in the production location.
However, my current 2.1b1 wa
At 12:17 PM 3/18/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Has anyone installed 2.1b1 on top of 2.0.8? I'm tempted to do so and I
>would appreciate any first hand experience.
>
>Is this recommended or is it prefered that we install 2.1b1 in another
>location and than move the 2.0.8 lists to the 2.1b1 location?
It o
Has anyone installed 2.1b1 on top of 2.0.8? I'm tempted to do so and I
would appreciate any first hand experience.
Is this recommended or is it prefered that we install 2.1b1 in another
location and than move the 2.0.8 lists to the 2.1b1 location?
thanks,
Mentor
__
