Re: [Mailman-Developers] HTML Issue

2001-06-25 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JD" == James Dinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JD> One problem that I have is that somtimes funny things will JD> happen inside the tags. Have I mentioned how much I dislike the tags? Or how much I reaaally hate having both those and normal Python %()s string substitutions? ;)

Re: [Mailman-Developers] HTML Issue

2001-06-25 Thread James Dinan
> Let's make our lives simple and say that any templated html file must > include its own html armor (and thus will be HeadlessDocument() > based), while all non-templated script-generated ones will be > Document() based to get the standard header and footers. > > If you agree, I can start fixing

Re: [Mailman-Developers] HTML Issue

2001-06-25 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "TW" == Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TW> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:49:27AM -0700, James Dinan wrote: TW> Yes. This is an open bug, and an old one. It still requires a TW> Pronouncement from Barry. The problem is that Mailman creates TW> a HTMLgen Document ins

Re: [Mailman-Developers] HTML Issue

2001-06-25 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Thomas Wouters | in Mailman/Cgi/listinfo.py, function listinfo_overview(). I believe Barry | is reluctant to fix it because of possible breakage (people might have made | template files with the (Headfull)Document in mind.) Barry ? :) Actually, the fix is in htmlformat.py, around line 281:

Re: [Mailman-Developers] HTML Issue

2001-06-25 Thread Thomas Wouters
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:49:27AM -0700, James Dinan wrote: > I posted this message to mailman-users, and then the more I was thinking > about it, the more I began to think this was a question for developers. > Please tell me what you think: > I am running Mailman 2.0.1 on Redhat 6.2 and I am