On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:38:53PM +0300, Mikhail Zabaluev wrote:
> This is totally unreliable. Some German-localized MUAs would use "AW:"
> instead of "Re:"; more exotic prefixes are possible. "Re:" is no more
> than convention.
Well, now; *that* explains something weird I saw on a list the othe
> "MZ" == Mikhail Zabaluev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MZ> This is totally unreliable. Some German-localized MUAs would
MZ> use "AW:" instead of "Re:"; more exotic prefixes are
MZ> possible. "Re:" is no more than convention. More reliable way
MZ> would be to track "Reference
Hello Barry,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:25:37AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
>
> > "BB" == Bill Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BB> Will 2.1 have the ability to just completey *drop* posts
> BB> matching a pattern, instead of holding them for moderation?
> BB> I've g
> "BB" == Bill Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BB> Will 2.1 have the ability to just completey *drop* posts
BB> matching a pattern, instead of holding them for moderation?
BB> I've got a couple of lists where Re: posts (replies back to
BB> the list) arent allowed; only i
