[Filtered back to -devel]
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:14:30AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> > "JRA" == Jay R Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> JRA> Two edged sword.
>
> JRA> I'm trying to remember whose message it is, Slashdot's, I
> JRA> think, that says "don't get your
Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>My interpretation of this section is that since regular deliveries use
>the From: field supplied by the original author, but it is Mailman's
>responsibility for sending the mail through the system, the Sender:
>field ought to be the human responsible for list maintenance,
>
I submitted:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=413257&group_id=103&atid=300103
Basically it adds a special list name: _alllists_
which does this:
usw-sf-list1:/var/local/mailman/bin# time ./remove_members -f /tmp/badmails _alllists_
User `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' removed from l
> "AM" == Andrew McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AM> You'll soon end up with a complex language for specifying
AM> things like "accept binary attachments only if preceeded by a
AM> text/plain", etc.. 8-)
Ug. It's probably inevitable, but I really don't want Mailman to
beco
Any opinions on its stability? I'm setting up a new server, and
am contemplating starting off with 2.1. Is it ready for prime-ish
time (I can investigate and resolve some problems) yet?
I'm also considering taking the Postfix plunge at the same time.
I probably need mental help. :)
>Ug. It's probably inevitable, but I really don't want Mailman to
>become a hypergeneralized MIME slicer-n-dicer.
Yes - I think it's sort of inevitable. If you structure your MIME
parser correctly, it may be relatively painless.
BTW, you should look at the perl MIME module (as used by Majordomo
> "DM" == Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> Any opinions on its stability? I'm setting up a new server,
DM> and am contemplating starting off with 2.1. Is it ready for
DM> prime-ish time (I can investigate and resolve some problems)
DM> yet?
I'm relatively comfortab
> "AM" == Andrew McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ug. It's probably inevitable, but I really don't want Mailman
>> to become a hypergeneralized MIME slicer-n-dicer.
AM> Yes - I think it's sort of inevitable. If you structure your
AM> MIME parser correctly, it may be
>I think mimelib is pretty good, certainly better than anything else
>I've seen for Python. I've got some nits about its interface, which
>I'll need to clean up for any 1.0 release (or for inclusion in Python,
>and I know Guido has some nits).
I had a quick look a few weeks back - my impression
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:04:57PM +1000, Andrew McNamara wrote:
> BTW, you should look at the perl MIME module (as used by Majordomo 2) -
> I understand that it's one of the best MIME interfaces around (although
> reading other people's perl is futile, it's interface doco might
> suggest some ide
10 matches
Mail list logo
