> "CG" == Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CG> I just added a feature to wrap, that lets you specify line
CG> breaks. If the last 2 characters on a line are \n, those
CG> characters are removed, and that line is not filled.
I'm not sure I want to add more rules to wrap(
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> I bring up an admin page,
MM> from the shell, I remove a user
MM> I change the user options in the web form, and click submit
MM> The error is correct, but mailman should probably return a
MM> simple error in the web
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> This version of the patch add --fromall which lets you remove
MM> a specified Email from all your lists (replaces my _alllists_
MM> special hack)
Applied, thanks.
-Barry
___
Mailma
> "JJB" == James J Besemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JJB> I recently started running a relatively small mailing list
JJB> using Mailman and am quite happy with it. I am a proficient
JJB> Python developer and the fact that Mailman is Python-based
JJB> was one reason I chose
There are two same questions, but in one place there is a space at the
end, while in the other there is not. I propose to remove the space in
the first case.
--
Misha
Index: admin.py
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/mailman/mailman/Mailman/C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cool! Since I'm strapped for time right now, I'm just going to
> comment briefly.
Thanks for the various pointers. Dunno how long before I'll be productive
(read Dangerous ;o).
> You'd think! I've had a couple of patches contributed that filter out
> HTML, but I'v
On Wed, 06 Mar 2002 11:01:51 -0800 "James J. Besemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> You'd think! I've had a couple of patches contributed that filter out
>> HTML, but I've not been able to whip them into shape for inclusion.
>> I've basically given up hope for MM2.1, b
Les Niles wrote:
> (It was the release of AOL 6.0, which doesn't allow
> turning off HTML, that prompted me.)
Exactly.
While, OTOH I agree these more robust formats are the future, it's insane to force
them on users and not allow them to turn them off.
--jb
--
James J. Besemer 503-280-0838
At 11:22 -0800 3/6/2002, Les Niles wrote:
>Most of the time you really can just strip out the HTML. AOL,
>Outhouse, and most of the other clients that like to generate HTML
>put out multipart/alternative messages that include a text/plain
>section, so picking out the latter and dropping the other
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:22:55PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
> > "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MM> root@gandalf:/var/local/mailman/bin# ./dumpdb
> MM> ../lists/test3/config.pck | grep user_options 'user_options':
> MM> {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': 266},
>
John W Baxter wrote:
> I suspect that sending a few blank messages to a list and being chastised
> for it would be sufficient training for some.
Yes, for some. ;o)
I think my situation is that there is a very vocal minority who hate HTML and there is
a similarly sized minority who can't figu
At 11:50 AM 3/5/02 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>> "CG" == Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>CG> *sigh* The problems with running such a low market share
>CG> platform like Solaris/SPARC *snort*
>
>Ah, okay. Well, I tried to get into the Solaris machines on the SF
>compil
On 3/6/02 4:14 PM, "James J. Besemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the host, I'd like to solve the problem if I can. Someday...
First step is -- "I run this list, this is how I plan on running it, and if
you insist on yelling about this stuff on the list, I'll kick YOU off
first."
There co
Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> First step is -- "I run this list, this is how I plan on running it, and if
> you insist on yelling about this stuff on the list, I'll kick YOU off
> first."
I don't agree, certainly not with this issue.
More generally -- the list IS the members -- not the admin or to
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:22:27AM +0900, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> That would work in the best of all possible worlds (i.e. NOT the real
> world :) but I think there is still information lost when converting
> some charsets into Unicode, like Big5 and EUC-TW. Also, who knows if
> we would corrupt
At 16:14 -0800 3/6/2002, James J. Besemer wrote:
>Another faction doesn't object to HTML per se except that the text in such
>messages (for them)
>appear in too small a font and they can't figure out how to change it.
Happens to me a lot since I read mail on my Macs, and a sensible size on a
Wind
Title: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Please Allow Me To Introduce Myself...
On 3/6/02 6:03 PM, "John W Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My solution is simple for mailing lists: if a message is hard to read, I
> don't read it (unless it seems to answer a question I posed, in which case
> I try)
> "JJB" == James J Besemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You'd think! I've had a couple of patches contributed that
>> filter out HTML, but I've not been able to whip them into shape
>> for inclusion. I've basically given up hope for MM2.1, but
>> will look at it again for
> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> This would violate RFC 1522:
SJT> That's right. People with broken mailers have broken
SJT> mailers. Make sure that things are robust for those with
SJ
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm, do a cvs update and try again. How's it look now?
MM> I subscribed to mailman-checkins, it's easier, I just waited
MM> to see the commit :-)
MM> BTW, here's a small patch on top of that:
I also added a catch of a p
"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote:
> Here's the basic problem: there are lots of different use cases that
> fall under the rubric "filtering HTML". Some people want it stripped,
> some want it transformed, do we preserve links, etc, etc. It's hard
> to support everything everyone wants to do with HTML m
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> This would violate RFC 1522:
SJT> That's right. People with broken mailers have broken
SJT> mailers.
Thread-relevant, so answered here.
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BAW> (Aside to Stephen: do you know if Kyle still handles VM bug
BAW> reports these days? ;).
That depends. If you suggest providing support for correspondence
with non-RFC-compliant MUAs, you
> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> Can we safely assume that all charsets folks will use with
Ben> Mailman will have us-ascii as a subset? It seems to be the
Ben> case so far.
Depends on how you define "subset". UTF-16 is what I have in mind.
--
Insti
> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> Can we safely assume that all charsets folks will use with
Ben> Mailman will have us-ascii as a subset? It seems to be the
Ben> case so far.
Stephen>
25 matches
Mail list logo
