Re: [Mailman-Developers] Headers and footers not appearing

2002-03-10 Thread Colin Mackinlay
In news:local.mailman-d> on Sun 10 Mar, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > > "Colin" == Colin Mackinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Colin> Hi, I seem to have lost the ability to add a customised > Colin> footer and header to messages. The FAQ says it was a > Colin> problem in 2.0 and fix

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Headers and footers not appearing

2002-03-10 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Colin" == Colin Mackinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> That's strange then, I only use plain text and the same Colin> format has had a footer added to it by this list :-) Sure. "plain text" messages can have Content-Type: headers specifying any charset, so make sure you look

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Headers and footers not appearing

2002-03-10 Thread Colin Mackinlay
On Sun 10 Mar, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > > > "Colin" == Colin Mackinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Colin> That's strange then, I only use plain text and the same > Colin> format has had a footer added to it by this list :-) > > Sure. "plain text" messages can have Content-Type: h

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Headers and footers not appearing

2002-03-10 Thread John W Baxter
At 10:59 + 3/10/2002, Colin Mackinlay wrote: >In news:local.mailman-d> on Sun 10 Mar, Ben Gertzfield wrote: >> > "Colin" == Colin Mackinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Colin> Hi, I seem to have lost the ability to add a customised >> Colin> footer and header to messages. The

[Mailman-Developers] BounceRunner eating up alot of memory

2002-03-10 Thread Fil
Hi, after a few more tests, I am confronted to a problem: the BounceRunner seems to load the list in its memory when it receives a bounce (in order to process that bounce). But it does this: 1- regardless of whether it's going to need the list or not 2- without releasing the memory afterwards I

Re: [Mailman-Developers] big list

2002-03-10 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BAW> Think of shunt as a safety net. If Mailman has a bug that BAW> causes an uncaught exception to occur while handling the BAW> message, it gets shuffled off to shunt, so that once the bug BAW> is fixed, you ought to be

Re: [Mailman-Developers] big list

2002-03-10 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: F> I think I've got it: the French translation of F> "This is a multi-part message in MIME format. F> " F> lacks the trailing linefeeds. Hence mutt (at least mutt) does F> not detect the part of the multipart message and shows

Re: [Mailman-Developers] big list

2002-03-10 Thread Ousmane Wilane
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: F> I think I've got it: the French translation of "This is a F> multi-part message in MIME format." I didn't find the offending string anywhere in the current Mailman source tree. Perhaps

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Headers and footers not appearing

2002-03-10 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "John" == John W Baxter writes: John> You're posting as John> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII John> Question for the gurus: could the upper case content type John> description be causing problems here? It very well could be. The problem is that *some* headers

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Headers and footers not appearing

2002-03-10 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BG" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "John" == John W Baxter writes: John> You're posting as John> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII John> Question for the gurus: could the upper case content type John> description be causing problems here?

Re: [Mailman-Developers] BounceRunner eating up alot of memory

2002-03-10 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: F> after a few more tests, I am confronted to a problem: the F> BounceRunner seems to load the list in its memory when it F> receives a bounce (in order to process that bounce). But it F> does this: 1- regardless of whether it's going

Re: [Mailman-Developers] [BUG] Users are created as moderated in CVS mailman

2002-03-10 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 08:30:03PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote: > However, I just realized that when I prepared my updated patch that I fed to > Barry last week, I forgot this: > > --- mailman-wp/Mailman/versions.py Fri Aug 17 14:40:28 2001 > +++ mailman/Mailman/versions.py Thu Sep 6 12:55:00

Re: [Mailman-Developers] a problem in upgrading with moderated lists

2002-03-10 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: F> Hi, F> when you upgrade Mailman to 2.1a3 from 2.0, moderated lists F> correctly take on the attributes | generic_nonmember_action = Hold | default_member_moderation = Yes F> However the latter is valid only for NE

[Mailman-Developers] Does mailman-cvs remove reply-to?

2002-03-10 Thread Marc MERLIN
On my test list, which doesn't have reply-to munging enabled, if I send a test post with a reply-to header, it doesn't make it to the list (or to ToOutgoing for that matter) Before I look into this deeper, is this just me? Marc -- Microsoft is to operating systems & security

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [BUG] Users are created as moderated in CVS mailman

2002-03-10 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BG" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BG> I'm not at all sure why this is, but on a completely fresh BG> install of CVS mailman, even though DEFAULT_NEW_MEMBER_OPTIONS BG> = 256, all my new list members are created with the BG> 'moderated' flag on. For new mem

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Does mailman-cvs remove reply-to?

2002-03-10 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MM> On my test list, which doesn't have reply-to munging enabled, MM> if I send a test post with a reply-to header, it doesn't make MM> it to the list (or to ToOutgoing for that matter) MM> Before I look into this deeper, is

Re: [Mailman-Developers] BounceRunner eating up alot of memory

2002-03-10 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BAW> For 2) That's a valid point. Please try the following patch BAW> (untested). I'll try to test it and if it looks good, I'll BAW> commit this change tomorrow. If you apply the patch, you'll also have to fix the __in

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Does mailman-cvs remove reply-to?

2002-03-10 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:49:05AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > > "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > MM> On my test list, which doesn't have reply-to munging enabled, > MM> if I send a test post with a reply-to header, it doesn't make > MM> it to the list (o

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [BUG] Users are created as moderated in CVS mailman

2002-03-10 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "BG" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BG> I'm not at all sure why this is, but on a completely fresh BG> install of CVS mailman, even though DEFAULT_NEW_MEMBER_OPTIONS BG> = 256, all my new list members are c

Re: [Mailman-Developers] BounceRunner eating up alot of memory

2002-03-10 Thread Fil
@ Barry A. Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > For 2) That's a valid point. Please try the following patch > (untested). I'll try to test it and if it looks good, I'll commit > this change tomorrow. There must be something missing: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mailman/bin/qrunne

Re: [Mailman-Developers] big list

2002-03-10 Thread Fil
@ Ousmane Wilane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > > "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > F> I think I've got it: the French translation of "This is a > F> multi-part message in MIME format." I was wrong, sorry Ousmane. It's something in the way the multi-part message is formed, but I can't f