[Mailman-Developers] A couple of questions.

2003-10-08 Thread Mike Lucas
I was wondering if anyone can help me with a couple questions. 1. Is it possible to turn off the email interface to mailman? We want to make them use the web interface only, if that is possible. 2. How does mailman store stateful information like auth credentials and passwords? 3. Can we send

Re: [Mailman-Developers] A couple of questions.

2003-10-08 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 10:59, Mike Lucas wrote: > I was wondering if anyone can help me with a couple questions. > > 1. Is it possible to turn off the email interface to mailman? We want > to make them use the web interface only, if that is possible. You have the source, so anything's possible.

[Mailman-Developers] FW: [Mailman-Users] DirecPC, MailShield and VERP

2003-10-08 Thread Jeff Hahn
I'm still trying to figure a way around this problem... Any ideas on a way to say "don't VERP this address"? Thanks! -Jeff -Original Message- In their infinite wisdom, DirecWay/DirecPC appear to be using a program that rejects VERP'd from addresses. The non-VERP'd messages are delive

[Mailman-Developers] msgmerge

2003-10-08 Thread Ron Jarrell
The comment in the makefile that says something like "You shouldn't have to do this, but if you need to rebuild the catalogs you'll need gnu make and msgmerge from the gnu gettext" probably ought to include a version number. I *did* have gettext; it was part of the big solaris 9 gnu utils disk

Re: [Mailman-Developers] FW: [Mailman-Users] DirecPC, MailShield and VERP

2003-10-08 Thread Richard Barrett
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 06:58 pm, Jeff Hahn wrote: I'm still trying to figure a way around this problem... Any ideas on a way to say "don't VERP this address"? Maybe if you restrict VERP'ing to personalised deliveries (in mm_cfg.py) and do not personalise mail for a list with proble

Re: [Mailman-Developers] FW: [Mailman-Users] DirecPC, MailShield and VERP

2003-10-08 Thread J C Lawrence
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:58:27 -0500 Jeff Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still trying to figure a way around this problem... Any ideas on > a way to say "don't VERP this address"? Try changing the plus addressing character to a '-' instead of '+'. -- J C Lawrence -