[Mailman-Developers] Mailman problem!

2004-09-09 Thread Simmo Siil
I'm using Mailman with Sendmail on SuSE. I have created several lists (on the list about 50...60 people each) Most of the people in the list are same server users. When I'm sending an email to the list, the server hangs (even working with the shell account is very slow). When I'm looking at the to

RE: [Mailman-Developers] Timestamps in archive are +1 hr

2004-09-09 Thread John . Airey
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > on.org]On > Behalf Of Chris Boulter > Sent: Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:29 > To: John W. Baxter > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Timestamps in archive are +1 hr > > > On Tue 2004-08-17

RE: [Mailman-Developers] Min requirements for running Mailman?

2004-09-09 Thread John . Airey
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > on.org]On > Behalf Of Tollef Fog Heen > Sent: Monday, 06 September 2004 16:47 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Min requirements for > running Mailman? > > > * Nigel Metheringham > >

RE: [Mailman-Developers] Min requirements for running Mailman?

2004-09-09 Thread John Dennis
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 08:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Red Hat have taken some packages out of RHEL eg arpwatch and mysql-server > (although this is in the "extras" channel) even though these are in the > source RPM. Mailman is currently not included but might be being put back in > to RHEL 4.0. I

RE: [Mailman-Developers] Min requirements for running Mailman?

2004-09-09 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 10:31 -0400, John Dennis wrote: > On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 08:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Red Hat have taken some packages out of RHEL eg arpwatch and mysql-server > > (although this is in the "extras" channel) even though these are in the > > source RPM. Mailman is currentl

RE: [Mailman-Developers] Min requirements for running Mailman?

2004-09-09 Thread Brad Knowles
At 3:48 PM +0100 2004-09-09, Nigel Metheringham wrote: Am I right in thinking that 2.1.5 does not have backward compatibility with 2.0.x versions, so it is not possible to directly upgrade a 2.0.x to 2.1.x? It takes a little more work, yes. See

RE: [Mailman-Developers] Min requirements for running Mailman?

2004-09-09 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 17:20 +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 3:48 PM +0100 2004-09-09, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > > Am I right in thinking that 2.1.5 does not have backward compatibility > > with 2.0.x versions, so it is not possible to directly upgrade a 2.0.x > > to 2.1.x? > > It tak

RE: [Mailman-Developers] Min requirements for running Mailman?

2004-09-09 Thread Brad Knowles
At 4:37 PM +0100 2004-09-09, Nigel Metheringham wrote: Someone with better python skills than I (probably the majority of people here) could have fixed up the list structure from the bit of code that exploded, but I found pretty much all the mailman tools just exploded when they saw the list da

[Mailman-Developers] PN-Mailmain PostNuke Module available

2004-09-09 Thread Glenn Crocker
I've released the first version of PN-Mailman, a PostNuke module for working with GNU Mailman lists. You can download it at: http://noc.postnuke.com/projects/pn-mailman/ PostNuke MailMan is a module that provides a web-based interface to the GNU Mailman email list management system. Users can s

[Mailman-Developers] Replacing the abomination Pipermail with Lurker

2004-09-09 Thread Pete Ashdown
Recently I investigated the current state of mailing list archivers and stumbled upon Lurker (lurker.sourceforge.net). Simply put, Lurker is to Pipermail as spaceships are to ice-skates. Has any consideration been given to tossing Pipermail as the default archiver and replacing it with something