--On Wednesday, December 1, 2004 09:05:20 GMT -0500 Barry Warsaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:07, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Sorry my response is slow :-)
No worries!
Yeah, I think I can contribute 2.2 while you are at 3.0. Looking back
the design notes, we have already some of
List of non-member addresses whose postings should be automatically
accepted.
How can i but there @domeen.com? without a name?
like '@domeen.com' -- how to get it work?
now i can use only single aadresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you help me?
Saapakusti
_
On Dec 2, 2004, at 7:22 AM, Simmo Siil wrote:
How can i but there @domeen.com? without a name?
like '@domeen.com' -- how to get it work?
now i can use only single aadresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
If I recall correctly, that field allows regular expressions.
Terri
At 10:47 AM + 2004-12-02, Ian Eiloart wrote:
Now, I know someone is going to point out that Apple provide a much
hacked version of Mailman - but that's a red herring. I'm referring to
people who put vanilla mailman on top of MacOSX - as we plan to do.
If you're going to put vanilla Mailman
Any plans to include a feature where the server administrator can force lists
to be confirmed opt-in? I administer a server that allows free mailing lists
to customers of our ISP, and forcing opt-in behavior is useful as it allows
tangible benefits with spam lists. I ask here because I haven'
Hi again,
Brad Knowles wrote:
If you're going to put vanilla Mailman on top of MacOS X, then you
could also install Python 2.4 as well.
And also, mailman 2.2 will no be out before next summer. I expect many
venders are including Python 2.4 by that time.
--
Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:23:20AM -0500, Terri Oda wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2004, at 7:22 AM, Simmo Siil wrote:
> >How can i but there @domeen.com? without a name?
> >like '@domeen.com' -- how to get it work?
> >now i can use only single aadresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Have you tried [EMAIL PROTEC
Jim Tittsler wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:23:20AM -0500, Terri Oda wrote:
>> On Dec 2, 2004, at 7:22 AM, Simmo Siil wrote:
>> >How can i but there @domeen.com? without a name?
>> >like '@domeen.com' -- how to get it work?
>> >now i can use only single aadresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> H
Hi guys! (and gals :) )
I remember when I first installed Majordomo and experiencing
majordisappointment that it didn't truly support virtual mail domains. It
suffered the same limitation that Mailman currently does:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are the same list.
I managed to work ar
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:36:55 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And also, mailman 2.2 will no be out before next summer. I expect many
> venders are including Python 2.4 by that time.
As a perhaps extraneous data point supporting this, the FreeBSD
lang/python port was bumped from
> "Ian" == Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> However, MacOSX and MacOSX Server have python Python 2.3 (#1,
Ian> Sep 13 2003, 00:49:11), so requiring 2.4 could cause pain for
Ian> anyone with a Mac installation of Mailman.
I'm not going to deprecate someone else's pain,
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
(1) Apple already has a couple of "multi-version" applications
standard (in particular, GCC, see the gcc_select utility)
gcc_select is completely broken, and doesn't work. It assumes that the
only 3.x is 3.1 and fails even at what it claims to do. I have tried
and fai
> "BAW" == Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BAW> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:07, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> May be we can go forward to requirement of Python 2.4 because
>> CJK codecs are integreted there.
BAW> I have no problems requiring Python 2.4 for Mailman 2.2,
BA
13 matches
Mail list logo
