--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Hello everybody. I'm a new list manager and I'm looking for some
documentation to make some changes that I haven't been able to make
through the /mailman/admin/listname web interface.
I went to www.list.org, but the documentation there explains how all this
(already known in my case) stuff /mailm
On 29 Mar 2001, at 11:44, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> "Richard B. Pyne" wrote:
> > With named vrtual domains, mailing lists are always created
> > defaulted to the domain where Mailman was originally installed (the
> > machine's default domain)
>
> I run named vdomains, to the same IP. Howe
> "cvr" == chuq von rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cvr> yup. and until the spam goes away, that'll continue,
cvr> too.
Our Exim administrator has installed the filters suggested by Marc
Merlin (thanks Marc). Let's see if that staunches the flow of spam.
-Barry
--
> "RBP" == Richard B Pyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RBP> There is the difference, I run ONE copy of Mailman for the
RBP> entire server. There should be no need to run a separate copy
RBP> for each virtual domain.
There should be no problem with this /except/ if you want lists
Hi, how can I set Mail man to configure it under web interface !
The software is already running over SCO platform
Thanks in advance
**
Marcelo S. Bitulka
Gerente de Soporte Técnico
Unisel Argentina S.A.
**
Vi
To whom it may concern:
Our company is looking for a software solution to manage an e-mail
newsletter to our clients and other interested parties on a regular basis.
The letter will be fairly straight forward and go out in tens or possibly
hundreds, but certainly no bigger volume than that. We al
I would like to put Mailman to use in an
organization I'm
doing some work for
*however* there is too much resistance
to the idea of requiring users to provide a password to
unsubscribe.
Does Mailman have an option to not require a
password
for the purposes of unsubscribing?
Are there
hello...
How can I see the attachs in the list archive in a correct format instead a 7
bit text?
Thanks a lot
Felipe
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
See http://nleaudio.com/bnotes/mailman.htm
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Hi all.
Last night i moved my mailman files from one server to another. I made a tar
of all the old files, did an scp to the new machine, untarred it, added the
appropriate users (mailman, apache) with the same uid and gids that they had
previously. whe i run check_list it tells me that the list
chuq von rospach wrote:
On Thursday, March 29, 2001, at 11:41 AM, alex wetmore wrote:
> In the past couple of weeks there have been many more messages
> complaining about the spam then spam itself...
yup. and until the spam goes away, that'll continue, too. Which is
another reason to m
On Friday, March 30, 2001, at 11:05 AM, Ron Echeverri wrote:
> I disagree. Since we can't control spammers, perhaps we should simply
> control ourselves, and instead of complaining about the spam, we
> should simply delete it. I
If you go home at night and smell gas, do you solve the problem
i'm positive the email is going through the new machine, cause i checked the
queue on the new machine. when i first moved everything, i cleared the queue,
so there wouldn't be any ambiguity. all of the aliases are set up correctly on
the new machine.
as far as i know, mailman is still running on
Noah,
Check to make sure you added the "crontab" entries on the new
server. They are listed by running crontab -l as the user mailman.
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Owner/Admin
deathcon.com - pirk.com
webops.com - disclaimer.com
--
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Noah Cantor wrote:
> i'm positive the email i
On 11:05 AM 3/30/01, Ron Echeverri wrote:
>I disagree. Since we can't control spammers, perhaps we should simply
>control ourselves, and instead of complaining about the spam, we
>should simply delete it. I'm sure Barry is doing all he can to limit
>the influx of crap, but there's little he
"Richard B. Pyne" wrote:
> No, not msconfigured. Mailman looks at the FQDN when deciding what
> lists to show, not just the second level domain. Changing this
> behaviour COULD cause other undesirable effects though.
You have mailman installed as 'foo.com', so it never knows about the
'www'
Here is the error I'm recieving... any ideas?:
The original message was received at Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:27:49 -0600
from localhost
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
"|/var/lib/mailman/mail/wrapper mailowner testing"
(expanded from: testing-admin)
- Tra
> I have 2 outstanding questions about mailman configuration options:
>
> 1) Does mailman have a configuration setting such that everyone who is
> subscribed to a list can post unmoderated, but email from a non-subscriber
> will be sent to a moderator for approval?
>
> Yes or No?
Yes
> To
De Jong, Rich writes:
> Here is the error I'm recieving... any ideas?:
>
> The original message was received at Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:27:49 -0600
> from localhost
>
>- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> "|/var/lib/mailman/mail/wrapper mailowner testing"
>
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Owner/Admin
deathcon.com - pirk.com
webops.com - disclaimer.com
--
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, JC Dill wrote:
>
> I have 2 outstanding questions about mailman configuration options:
>
> 1) Does mailman have a configuration setting such that everyone who is
> subscribed to
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, JC Dill wrote:
> I have 2 outstanding questions about mailman configuration options:
I've answered these before.
> 1) Does mailman have a configuration setting such that everyone who is
> subscribed to a list can post unmoderated, but email from a non-subscriber
> will be
At 05:14 PM 3/30/2001 -0500, Robert V. MacQuarrie wrote:
>Absolutely the best mailing list manager I have ever used! Thanks!
>
>One feature I'd love to see added would be an option to allow new list
>members to only view archives from there joining date. For example, if
>user joins or is added on
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:11:58 -0800
chuq von rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, March 30, 2001, at 11:05 AM, Ron Echeverri wrote:
>> I disagree. Since we can't control spammers, perhaps we should
>> simply control ourselves, and instead of complaining about the
>> spam, we should s
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:22:18 -0800
JC Dill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11:05 AM 3/30/01, Ron Echeverri wrote:
> 1) Does mailman have a configuration setting such that everyone
> who is subscribed to a list can post unmoderated, but email from a
> non-subscriber will be sent to a moderator fo
I just upgraded my list server from sendmail 8.9.3 to sendmail 8.11.3 and now I am
getting errors from smrsh about wrapper not available for sendmail programs.
smrsh: wrapper not available for sendmail programs
554 5.0.0 "|/home/mailman/mail/wrapper post listname"
any ideas what I should l
At 03:29 PM 3/30/2001 -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
>Without questioning the boundaries of topic or religion on this one,
>there's also the argument that allowing spammers to control and
>alter our behaviour, and thereby granting them that power and
>influence over us is fundamentally WRONG and that
On Mar 30, 2001 at 10:52, Mario Pacheco wrote:
>I would like to put Mailman to use in an organization I'm
>doing some work for *however* there is too much resistance
>to the idea of requiring users to provide a password to
>unsubscribe.
Will this do what you want?
http://satya.virtualave.net
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:24:30 -0500
reb wrote:
> At 03:29 PM 3/30/2001 -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> Without questioning the boundaries of topic or religion on this
>> one, there's also the argument that allowing spammers to control
>> and alter our behaviour, and thereby granting them that pow
Let's develop the analogy here...
An airport security system can be likened to restricting posts
to list subscribers. Sure, we all have to stand in line and
occasionally empty our pockets before we can get on a plane.
This is a minor inconvenience, but a lot less annoying than
getting blow
At 05:53 PM 3/30/2001 -0800, Dave Melton wrote:
>Let's develop the analogy here...
>
>An airport security system can be likened to restricting posts
>to list subscribers. Sure, we all have to stand in line and
>occasionally empty our pockets before we can get on a plane.
>This is a minor inconve
Does anyone have any experience using Mailman with CommunigatePro from
Stalker Software? CGPro also has some list functionality, but I am already
running a number of lists with Mailman that I am loathe to have to move (to
say nothing of the fact that the list functionality in CGPro costs money I
d
I run a set of mailing lists using mailman and qmail. I've got the lists set up fine,
everything is running smoothly, except that sometimes people complain that they didn't
receive a particluar message, while others have received it. It has happened on more
than one list, and with different m
33 matches
Mail list logo
