On Sun, 13 May 2001 21:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Boris Krivulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Question: why only half works ? Is the welcome message sending
> code different than the mass-mailing one ?
Read your MTA logs with care. Its alsmost certain that the clues
are there.
--
J C Lawrence
Hi Guys,
We, xraymedia.com, are setting up mailman (lists.xray.tv).
In addition we are setting up a mail server supporting web and pop access
(mail.xray.tv).
Separately they both work fine. When an xray.tv user ( e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED])
appears as a list member, he/she doesn't receive mass
On Sun, 13 May 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2001 16:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
> alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 13 May 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
> >> There's reason to keep the RCPT TO envelope reasonably small to
> >> prevent triggering some ISP's SPAM traps. Specific
On Sun, 13 May 2001 16:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> There's reason to keep the RCPT TO envelope reasonably small to
>> prevent triggering some ISP's SPAM traps. Specifically, this
>> appears to be one of the filter point
Hello all.
I installed Mailman on my server, and i want all the lists to run with
domain lists.domain.com.
So i setup DNS, add lists.domain.com to rcpthosts and
lists.domain.com:mailman to virtualdomains under /var/qmail/control.
After that, i create a test list, "newlist testlist".
Then I confi
On Sun, 13 May 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
> There's reason to keep the RCPT TO envelope reasonably small to
> prevent triggering some ISP's SPAM traps. Specifically, this
> appears to be one of the filter points that AOL uses (and of course
> it then drops the caught mail silently without a bounce
Hi,
I'm trying to set up mailman but I'm not getting something right.
When I go to my mailman site's admin page,
http://www.deangeuls.com/mailman/admin, I can see a list of links that I
have set up with the ./newlist command. But when I click on one of the
links to administer the list, I get no
On Sun, 13 May 2001 08:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My mailman installation talks to the Windows 2000 SMTP MTA, where
> there are no performance problems with having the batching set to
> a very high number. Multiple queues can send out the same message
> at the s
On 5/13/01 1:21 AM, "Tib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're running on a 384k dsl then the only advertising is the stuff you put
> up yourself because it's your server.
Not true, but also not really relevant -- I was using it only as an example,
since it's my home DSL. My big stuff is somew
On Sun, 13 May 2001 01:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
tib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2001, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>> On 5/13/01 12:22 AM, "Tib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If the piece of email is sponsored and has advertising, it's a
>> HUGE problem. As was the original poster's note
On Sat, 12 May 2001 23:19:15 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/12/01 10:43 PM, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 3) If delivery failures are clogging your MTA queue and are
>> noticably slowing delivery rates, you need to start thinking
>> about reviewing your M
On Sun, 13 May 2001 00:41:16 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/13/01 12:22 AM, "Tib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Who has email that does not have web access at the time they get
>> their email?
> Not a huge number, but not zero. As wireless mobile becomes more
> signifi
On Sun, 13 May 2001 00:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
tib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> Your math is off as it ignores RCPT-TO envelope size.
> So throw in a few more bytes times 10k and it gets even bigger
Chuq has already addressed this point thoroughly.
>> Ac
On Sat, 12 May 2001 23:21:05 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/12/01 10:51 PM, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I find this curious. I have MAX_RCPT_TO set to 5, and to
>> broadcast 30 messages to a subscriber base of 1,000 (ie 6,000
>> spool entries) through
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> On 5/12/01 6:52 PM, "Ian White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which variables should be changed? It looks like the following could use
> > some changes:
> > SMTP_MAX_RCPTS = 500
>
> Between 5 and 10 - that should be set for any mailman installation.
Dear list-members,
I searched the archives and the whole web without any success. So, you'll understand
that any help on the following topic will be appreciated:
Trying to install Mailman-2.0.5 failed. Honestly, it's my 6th try, and I think it's
time to ask some people being more successful. A
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> On 5/13/01 12:22 AM, "Tib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the piece of email is sponsored and has advertising, it's a HUGE problem.
> As was the original poster's note on this stuff.
If you're running on a 384k dsl then the only advertising is the
On 5/13/01 12:44 AM, "Roger B.A. Klorese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you expect wireless mobile NOT to have web access? Hell, I use my web
> access when mobile much more than my email access.
No, but I expect wireless mobile to have limitations on display -- not to
the level that WAP hoses
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> As wireless mobile becomes more significant, it'll be a growing issue,
> not a shrinking one.
Do you expect wireless mobile NOT to have web access? Hell, I use my web
access when mobile much more than my email access.
--
ROGER B.A. KLORESE
On 5/13/01 12:22 AM, "Tib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who has email that does not have web access at the time they get their email?
Not a huge number, but not zero. As wireless mobile becomes more
significant, it'll be a growing issue, not a shrinking one.
> True: users who have a bland inter
On Sat, 12 May 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
> Your math is off as it ignores RCPT-TO envelope size.
So throw in a few more bytes times 10k and it gets even bigger
> 1) If your messages are getting corrupted, AT ALL, you have far more
> serious problems than how fast your system is able to deliver
Hello mailman users,
Mailman is only supporting footers and headers for text based
mails and not for html formated mail. does any body tried to use html
formatted mail with footers and headers. please write any suggestions.
Thanks in Advance
Vijay
--
22 matches
Mail list logo