On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Scott Courtney wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 01:42 pm, J C Lawrence wrote:
> > You might to look over the RFCs for SMTP and pay particular attention to
> > the bits about guarantees and transaction handling.
> [...]
> >
> > It tends to define a whole lot of sync() and open
I just posted this to list-managers. I think it's relevant enough to mailman
users that I'm posting a copy here. Apologies in advance to those who see
this twice or see it as noise...
I mentioned this a week or so ago as part of another thread. I've been
thinking about it ever since, and
I' released Mailman 2.0.12 which fixes a cross-site scripting
vulnerability, among other changes. I recommend that folks upgrade
their 2.0.x systems to this new version. See below for a NEWS file
excerpt.
As usual, I've made both full source tarballs and patches available.
See
http://sour
Hi
I am a nex comer to the world of Mailman.
I have installed Mailman on my system.
I want to know how to attach a file to a mail whcih the mailman sends.
Thanks and Regards
Bharde Tajuddin
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi, I am setting up mailman to replace Lyris as our listserv manager,
and so far things are going great. Unfortunately I have come across a
small problem, I'm using an external archiver (hypermail - my boss
likes its output better than pipermail) which I have set up to work and
it will automatic
Hello,
I've got a mail list running under different mail list manager. I'd
like to migrate the archive of this mail list to Mailman. Can you
please help me how can I do this? All I've got is the mbox-styled
messages archive from the previous manager.
Thanks.
--
Alexander Prohorenko
-
On Thursday 11 July 2002 01:42 pm, J C Lawrence wrote:
> You might to look over the RFCs for SMTP and pay particular attention to
> the bits about guarantees and transaction handling.
[...]
>
> It tends to define a whole lot of sync() and open()/close() calls (which
> latter force a buffer and in
I'm still using Mailman 2.0 beta - never bothered upgrading as it works
fine as a one-way newsletter list. Waiting for 2.1.
I understand the concept of Umbrella lists. We run several lists and the
membership across the lists runs about 10% -- meaning about 10% of one list
is also on a second l
On your program, you have a way to add many users at once without them
recieving an email.
However, I can not find a way to delete a bunch of users without them
being notified. I tried setting them no "nomail" and then unsubscribing
them, but they will still recieve the exit message.
I thought
Unless the list is set to confirm ... then they will only get subscribed if
they mail back the confirmation. My lists are set up to subscribe via the
web using multiple checkboxes and PHP...it has worked excellent since it
was installed in March 2002I did attempt the unsubscribe in the sam
Here's a wierd one. I run a mailing list which is set to "subscriber
list visible only to administrator", and it seems that some addresses
(if not all) have leaked onto a spam list.
- I'm (reasonably) certain the user did not simply use the same address
elsewhere -- the user uses sneakemail.c
Hi :-)
we are thinking of migrating from majordomo to Mailman mainly for 2
reasons :
1- French support
2- Web interface for users and lists administrators.
We have over 450 lists in majordomo, with several different
configurations. I suppose we are not the first institution to do this
"migratio
Hi
First my System-Configuration
RedHat 7.3
Python 2.2
Apache 1.3.23
gcc 2.96
sendmail 8.11
I have been tried to run Mailman 2.0.12 and that worked,
but I need a german Mailman. So I tried Mailman 2.1b2 with
Multi-Lingual Support.
I removed the previous version of Mailman and configured
the new
Hello Mailmen :),
I've got a problem and hopefully you'll help me to find a way out. I
need to customize a Welcome message (subscribeack.txt template) for
every list, by other words - I need it to different things for
different lists. Are there any way to customize it, as well as I can
do subsc
Am I correct in saying that, by default, accessing mydomain.com/mailman
results in an error? Or did I mess something up in the installation? I
was thinking about just setting the server to redirect all requests for
/mailman to /mailman/listinfo, or something like that... would I run
into som
I'm using Mailman 2.0.8 and have been having some problems with my archives. I hope
someone can give me a suggestion as to how to clear up the mess.
Some of the mailing lists are fine, but in a few mailing lists, only the last two
months
are available from the web menu. Looking in the
/usr/
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:32:35 -0400
Scott Courtney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 11:59 am, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:43:06 -0400
> And from your comments, it appears that my first suspicion of my own
> idea was correct: it's not practical. Thanks for th
On 11 Jul 2002 17:14:36 +0100
Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 16:59, J C Lawrence wrote:
> [I have reordered the quotes here - sorry if I have broken the
> meaning]
Hehn. A favoured habit of mine.
> But full data journalling on an MTA type system can gai
On Thursday 11 July 2002 11:59 am, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:43:06 -0400
>
> Scott Courtney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 July 2002 12:14 am, J C Lawrence wrote:
> >> a) Add more RAM. Number of queue runners for your MTA
> >
> > Here's a silly question: Is it wo
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:39:00 -0400
Scott Courtney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 09:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In that kind of an environment, my idea for a RAMDISK-based
> /var/spool/mqueue might not be so far-fetched, on the Mailman machine
> iteslf, because the
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:39:00 -0400
Scott Courtney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What method are you using to determind what relay gets each outbound
> message transaction?
First order optimisation is domain suffix routing (all .edu there, all
.org there, all aol.com over there, etc). That can t
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 16:59, J C Lawrence wrote:
[I have reordered the quotes here - sorry if I have broken the meaning]
> Journalling actually is a loss in this sort of scenario due to the extra
> tracking and buffer copy overhead. The nice thing about ReiserFS and
> XFS in particular is that th
I apologize if this gets posted multiple times. I accidentally sent the
message from the wrong account, one not subscribed to the list, and so
it's tied up waiting for admin approval. Hopefully the admin will see
this and just delete it.
---
I just set up Mailman, and everything seems to be
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:43:06 -0400
Scott Courtney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 12:14 am, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> a) Add more RAM. Number of queue runners for your MTA
> Here's a silly question: Is it worth considering *really* upping the
> RAM, say to two gigabytes, and
Gerry Doyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Detlef Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> | | href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe;body=sub
> | scribe">
>
> The "subscribe" e-mail works great! But, passing "unsubcribe" or
> "un-subscribe" is not recognized.
For unsubscribe a passwor
Greg Westin hath declared on Thursday the 11 day of July 2002 :-:
> I think I'm all set now... sorry about the trouble. But if anyone can
> tell me any particular changes I should make to my configuration so that
> things work better with Postfix, please let me know. I think I did what
> t
Hello!
--On Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:51 PM +0200 Detlef Neubauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> I would prefer to create some sort of an HTML link on my web site
|> which, when clicked, will launch the users on mail software and
|> have the Send and Subject line already filled in that will eithe
On Thursday 11 July 2002 09:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Agree with all that. Am using Compaq 380, 5 x 36 Gb hard discs and
> hardware Raid5, 1Gb RAM and 512Mb swap, Reiserfs.
>
> However on these machines mailman is sending batches of mail to separate
> MTA/relays.
That's a good idea, too,
On Thursday 11 July 2002 12:14 am, J C Lawrence wrote:
> Tim Crouch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Obviously disk size will be number one on the priority, but I am
> > looking for what you would run this on. OS will be RH Linux 7.3 the
> > hardware will be from Dell. I am leaning towards the fol
29 matches
Mail list logo
