Hi Everyone,
I have just installed the newsletter, but what code do I use
to attach this to a "Subscribe to Newsletter" button, that I have designed for a
website??
Thanks
Rachel
www.grapevinewebdesigns.co.nz
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Title: Problem with Public Domain
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Premus
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Problem
with Public Domain
I installed mailman 2.0.13-3
The archives have a script for this (for versions 2.0.x), and you can
easily modify the script found here to do it (you will have to be system
admin):
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq03.007.htp
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 12:25, Gary Smith wrote:
Hi.
How do I find out the pa
Title: Problem with Public Domain
I installed mailman 2.0.13-3 as part of the install on RH 8.0. The MTA is local.
When I create a mailing list it does not show up as a publicly advertised mailing list for the domain. How do I set it to default to a publicly advertised mailing list.
These a
Hi.
How do I find out the passwords of subscribers with out clicking on the 'send me my password button'?
Thanks,
Gary SmithMSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://m
I've just set my options for this list to receive the digest. The digest
which arrived is not formatted in the same way as the digest on the list
I administer. There are no headers or footers between the messages
breaking them up and making them easier to read.
This may be a difference between my
Our organization recently changed its email addresses from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have a number of mailman
mailing lists, and have moved the subscriptions from oldname.net to
newname.net.
For reasons I am not quite sure, many users emails are still identified
as coming from [EMA
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:09:33 -0500 (EST)
Steve Rifkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root@sun(~)> python -V
> Python 2.1
> root@sun(~)>
>
It probably really doesn't matter, but I have Mailman running on
Python 2.2.1
--
Raquel
Whenever
root@sun(~)> python -V
Python 2.1
root@sun(~)>
As you can see, the version of python is 2.1, and yes, the version we tried, but
got the error with, was 2.2.2.
>From the 2.1 README file:
==
This is Python version 2.1
==
Copyrigh
> "SR" == Steve Rifkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SR> For that specific problem, we re-installed the previous
SR> version (2.1) of python, and we do not get errors. Installing
SR> python 2.2 yields us the error. It's pretty consistant in
SR> terms of when we put on 2.2, we
For that specific problem, we re-installed the previous version (2.1) of python,
and we do not get errors. Installing python 2.2 yields us the error. It's
pretty consistant in terms of when we put on 2.2, we get the error, but when we
put back 2.1, we're fine. So, we're at 2.1 and most things
* sean pambianco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What does this log messages mean:
>
> Dec 11 09:04:04 2002 (82700) Photonians post from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> held: Message has implicit destination
> Dec 12 00:24:00 2002 (96856) Photonians post from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> held: Message has implicit destin
What does this log messages mean:
Dec 11 09:04:04 2002 (82700) Photonians post from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
held: Message has implicit destination
Dec 12 00:24:00 2002 (96856) Photonians post from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
held: Message has implicit destination
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I X'd out the fir
Thanks for your reply.
But it seems that 1.1.x works differently.
There is no held messages in ~mailman/data.
I checked for the same situation in 2.0.x so
I know the filename type which should exist in that
directory for your recipe to be effective... :-(
Thanks anyway...
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 a
Looks like its getting to the lists (or at least the wrapper). What do
the Mailman logs show?
Check out FAQ 3.14, and good Luck - Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 02:06, Amrik Randhawa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had mailman working on my old Mandrake system but have just done a fresh install
>of
Hmm, not sure if it will work with version 1.1 but in the 2.0.x versions
you can simply delete the held messages in the ~mailman/data/..
directory and then run the Web-admindb. It automatically checks for new
messages and at that time discovers that the old ones have all been
deleted.
There is an
16 matches
Mail list logo