Re: [Mailman-Users] pipermail config problem

2003-02-04 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Options FollowSymLinks http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#options states that Note: this option gets ignored if set inside a section. Use Options Indexes FollowSymLinks -- Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/ --

[Mailman-Users] pipermail config problem

2003-02-04 Thread Shaun W. Kruger
I've looked through a couple of months of the mailman-users archive and the FAQ. That said I feel safe asking this... I added Alias /pipermail/ /var/lib/mailman/archives/public/ to my Apache httpd.conf. After that I was getting things like this in my /var/log/apache/error.log... [Tue Feb 4 2

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting Tracebacks quite a bit

2003-02-04 Thread Matthew Davis
* Simon White ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I just ran check_db --verbose --all > > I got this during run (although all other output seemed to suggest the > dbs were OK) > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 270, in ? > main() > File "/home/mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting incorrect URL's on site

2003-02-04 Thread Matthew Davis
* Adam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > http://mysite.mycompany.com/listinfo/mysite.company.com/admin/listname > > Obviously, no such link exists. I can see that in Defaults.py there are entries > > DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'mysite.mycompany.com' > DEFAULT_URL_HOST = 'mysite.mycompany.com' > DEFAULT_URL_

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't admin pending messages -- me too

2003-02-04 Thread James Devenish
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:22:38AM +0800, James Devenish wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:09:25PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote: > > Look at ~mailman/bin/fix_url.py. [...] > I wasn't clear on when I would be prompted for an address. Whoo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't admin pending messages -- me too

2003-02-04 Thread James Devenish
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:09:25PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote: > Look at ~mailman/bin/fix_url.py. Yes, I was going to mention that but the notes at the top of the file said "This script is intended to be run as a bin/withlist script, i.e. bin/withlist -l -r fix_url list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't admin pending messages -- me too

2003-02-04 Thread Jon Carnes
Look at ~mailman/bin/fix_url.py. HtH - Jon Carnes On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 19:46, James Devenish wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:58:02AM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote: > >If you redirect a POST using mod_redirect, you lose > > Yes, that is what appears to be happ

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't admin pending messages -- me too

2003-02-04 Thread James Devenish
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:46:52AM +0800, James Devenish wrote: >config_list, move_list, withlist scripts will Hmm, doesn't seem to match my Mailman 2.1 installation. Nevertheless, the important part for me was its confi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't admin pending messages -- me too

2003-02-04 Thread James Devenish
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:58:02AM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote: >If you redirect a POST using mod_redirect, you lose Yes, that is what appears to be happening. It seems that the admindb web forms (and e-mail to list admins) point to the (old) address. The other admi

RE: [Mailman-Users] Disabling VERP

2003-02-04 Thread Richard Barrett
At 22:02 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote: > > > >So, is it possible to disable the VERP functionality in some > fashion? My > > > >users would prefer to have regular From: and Reply-to: > headers, not the > > > >irritating VERP ones. I'm hesitant to make changes to the > > > VERP_FORMAT and > > > >

RE: [Mailman-Users] Disabling VERP

2003-02-04 Thread Richard Barrett
At 22:42 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote: > > I tried twiddling the VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL setting, but it made no > > difference. > > Hey Tom... a couple of questions (forgive me if they sound silly, or if > they've already been asked): > > 1) Are you changing ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py--not > ~mail

RE: [Mailman-Users] Disabling VERP

2003-02-04 Thread Tom Maddox
> > I tried twiddling the VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL setting, but it made no > > difference. > > Hey Tom... a couple of questions (forgive me if they sound silly, or if > they've already been asked): > > 1) Are you changing ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py--not > ~mailman/Mailman/Defaults.py? (and if you're

RE: [Mailman-Users] Disabling VERP

2003-02-04 Thread Glenn Sieb
Tom Maddox said: > I tried twiddling the VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL setting, but it made no > difference. Hey Tom... a couple of questions (forgive me if they sound silly, or if they've already been asked): 1) Are you changing ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py--not ~mailman/Mailman/Defaults.py? (and if you'

RE: [Mailman-Users] Disabling VERP

2003-02-04 Thread Tom Maddox
> > > >So, is it possible to disable the VERP functionality in some > fashion? My > > > >users would prefer to have regular From: and Reply-to: > headers, not the > > > >irritating VERP ones. I'm hesitant to make changes to the > > > VERP_FORMAT and > > > >VERP_REGEXP lines in mm_cfg.py without k

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with listinfo and advertised in globalvirtual host setup(I did my homework)

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Werby
"Vivek Khera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "SW" == Steve Werby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SW> I recently installed Mailman 2.1 on a machine running Apache 1.3.20. > SW> Mailman is installed in a central location and made available to all virtual > SW> sites via an Apache ScriptAlias dire

RE: [Mailman-Users] Disabling VERP

2003-02-04 Thread Richard Barrett
At 18:13 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote: > At 00:08 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote: > >So, is it possible to disable the VERP functionality in some fashion? My > >users would prefer to have regular From: and Reply-to: headers, not the > >irritating VERP ones. I'm hesitant to make changes to the > VE

Re: [Mailman-Users] Per Virtual domain customizations

2003-02-04 Thread John Locke
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 09:25, Todd wrote: > I haven't seen anyone announce a MySQLMemberAdaptor yet either, but > Martin > Whinnery made an announcement here a few weeks ago for an > LDAPMemberAdaptor. > If you know some python, perhaps you want to look at the LDAP version > and > try and convert i

Re: [Mailman-Users] master-qrunner.pid

2003-02-04 Thread VLists.Net Support
Someone asked about the content of the qrunner log and another some other questions about processes and such, as well as the status of the archives. The archives are a bit behind. The last seven messages to the list have yet to appear in the archive pages. In fact, I notice a huge time lag betwe

RE: [Mailman-Users] Disabling VERP

2003-02-04 Thread Tom Maddox
> At 00:08 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote: > >So, is it possible to disable the VERP functionality in some fashion? My > >users would prefer to have regular From: and Reply-to: headers, not the > >irritating VERP ones. I'm hesitant to make changes to the > VERP_FORMAT and > >VERP_REGEXP lines in mm

Re: [Mailman-Users] Modifying the results of the "who" email command.

2003-02-04 Thread Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John DeCarlo wrote: > If anyone has looked at doing this or something similar, I would > appreciate any pointers. So far I haven't even found the script that > responds to the "who" command. I haven't done anything like this, but I believe the plac

[Mailman-Users] Modifying the results of the "who" email command.

2003-02-04 Thread John DeCarlo
Hello, The current results of sending the "who" command via email is a list of all the members of the list, divided into Digest and Non-digest. However, I would like to break out the members who are disabled separately from those receiving mail. If anyone has looked at doing this or something

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with listinfo and advertised in global virtual host setup(I did my homework)

2003-02-04 Thread Vivek Khera
> "SW" == Steve Werby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SW> I recently installed Mailman 2.1 on a machine running Apache 1.3.20. SW> Mailman is installed in a central location and made available to all virtual SW> sites via an Apache ScriptAlias directive. The lists function properly and SW> all ar

Re: [Mailman-Users] Per Virtual domain customizations

2003-02-04 Thread Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Locke wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 00:40, Simon White wrote: > > I do this via synchronisation. A script that calls > > add_member/remove_member called from the code that does the > > INSERT/DELETE query in SQL. It's not particularly robust but

[Mailman-Users] Problem with listinfo and advertised in global virtual host setup(I did my homework)

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Werby
I recently installed Mailman 2.1 on a machine running Apache 1.3.20. Mailman is installed in a central location and made available to all virtual sites via an Apache ScriptAlias directive. The lists function properly and all are accessible, but are not listed on the listinfo page even though adver

[Mailman-Users] "No mailman user found" error when building Mailman 2.1

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Rifkin
Having problems installing mailman 2.1 on a Solaris 8 Ultra 10 machine using GCC 3.2.1 and python 2.2.2 I'm installing as mailman, and the configure dies with (see more below): mailman> ./configure --prefix=/users/mailman --with-python=/usr/local/bin/python --with-cgi-gid=65534 --with-mail-gid

Re: [Mailman-Users] Per Virtual domain customizations

2003-02-04 Thread John Locke
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 00:40, Simon White wrote: > 03-Feb-03 at 20:00, John Locke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > > 1. Is there any support for storing member information in a SQL > > database, with MM 2.1? > > > > I do this via synchronisation. A script that calls > add_member/remove_member ca

Re: [Mailman-Users] Archive Bug in CVS Scrubber.py

2003-02-04 Thread David Eisner
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > I think this bug is fixed. Please get a patch from > >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=670167&group_id=103&atid=300103 The patch seems to work. Thanks! -David +--+ David Eisner

Re: [Mailman-Users] Setup Issues

2003-02-04 Thread Simon White
03-Feb-03 at 14:52, drmichaelmason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I have just recently tried to setup my list and am having some > problems. For some reason, I send an e-mail to the list and nothing > happens. I am unable to find it on the server and it does not get > dispatched out to the members

[Mailman-Users] Setup Issues

2003-02-04 Thread drmichaelmason
I have just recently tried to setup my list and am having some problems. For some reason, I send an e-mail to the list and nothing happens. I am unable to find it on the server and it does not get dispatched out to the members. Any ideas? Tony

Re: [Mailman-Users] pipermail archive + order by date

2003-02-04 Thread Jon Carnes
I don't have this problem at all, and my threading works fine as well. What version of Mailman are you using and what is your ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE set to? # This sets the default `clobber date' policy for the archiver. # When a message is to be archived either by Pipermail or an # external

RE: [Mailman-Users] Initial Setup Issues

2003-02-04 Thread Jon Carnes
Unfortunately you did not answer my question... If the admin pages for your list are: http://mysite.domain/mailman/admin/ Then what do you see when you go to: http://mysite.domain/mailman/admindb/ On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 06:08, dino wrote: > Nope. Only the single member I manually added shows u

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't admin pending messages -- me too

2003-02-04 Thread Jon Carnes
Let me point you to a posting from the archives from Vivek Khera: If you redirect a POST using mod_redirect, you lose the data. The workaround is to capture the POST data from the original request, convert it to a GET and redirect to that. But then if you're sending the first req

[Mailman-Users] date header missing in digest

2003-02-04 Thread kenneth
Hello all, I just noticed the following while looking at my list of mails, there is no "date" in the header of a digest ! Have a look: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 19281 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 07:35:49 - Received: from localhos

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1 mailpasswds error

2003-02-04 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "jam" == John A Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jam> ,[ Google ] | Your search - "Warsaw's 4th Law" - did not jam> match any documents. ` jam> :-) Try "Warsaw's Fourth Law" :) -Barry -- Mailman-Users mailing lis

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1 mailpasswds error

2003-02-04 Thread John A. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw > "Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1 mailpasswds error" > Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:39:57 -0500 BAW> see Warsaw's 4th Law. :) Pointer? ,[ Google ] | Your search - "Warsaw's 4th Law" - did not match any documents

[Mailman-Users] pipermail archive + order by date

2003-02-04 Thread kenneth
I posted this a while ago, but got no response to my question. Why does pipermail mess up the order of mails ? What changes need to be made to have all mails in the correct order by date (taking into account that mails from australia and from the US should be listed in the correct date-order) ?

RE: [Mailman-Users] Initial Setup Issues

2003-02-04 Thread dino
Although I am now having some thoughts...probably not relevant but you never know! Here is my installation history: 1. Installed Mailman 2.1, but had major problems 2. My ISP (I rent a virtual server) told me that they were only supporting 2.0.x at this time, thus: 3. Installed 2.0.13 as it is th

RE: [Mailman-Users] Initial Setup Issues

2003-02-04 Thread dino
Nope. Only the single member I manually added shows up anywhere at all. -Original Message- From: Jon Carnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2003 00:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mailman users Mailing list Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Initial Setup Issues Not to be too obtuse

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Digest Topic Lists

2003-02-04 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Folks, Please try my new patch to ToDigest.py, http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?group_id=103&atid=300103&file_id=41440&aid=674401 You may also want fix some bug in Scrubber.py, http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?group_id=103&atid=300103&file_id=41438&aid=670167 Both patches are

[Mailman-Users] Getting Tracebacks quite a bit

2003-02-04 Thread Simon White
I just ran check_db --verbose --all I got this during run (although all other output seemed to suggest the dbs were OK) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 270, in ? main() File "/home/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 230, in main qrunner.run() File "

Re: [Mailman-Users] Disabling VERP

2003-02-04 Thread Richard Barrett
At 00:08 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote: So, is it possible to disable the VERP functionality in some fashion? My users would prefer to have regular From: and Reply-to: headers, not the irritating VERP ones. I'm hesitant to make changes to the VERP_FORMAT and VERP_REGEXP lines in mm_cfg.py without

[Mailman-Users] Getting incorrect URL's on site

2003-02-04 Thread Adam
On a new list I created I'm getting incorrect url links This is how it stands: http://mysite.mycompany.com/listinfo/mysite.company.com/admin/listname Obviously, no such link exists. I can see that in Defaults.py there are entries DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'mysite.mycompany.com' DEFAULT_URL_HOST =

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't admin pending messages -- me too

2003-02-04 Thread James Devenish
Hi, Last month there was a thread about a problem that I am now having. Was a solution, or at least a cause, found? The problem, as stated by the original poster, is "It shows the pending messages with the choices - but if I select to approve, reject, or discard - nothing happens after I click su

Re: [Mailman-Users] Per Virtual domain customizations

2003-02-04 Thread Simon White
03-Feb-03 at 20:00, John Locke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Nothing but silence... Let me simplify & rephrase my questions: > > 1. Is there any support for storing member information in a SQL > database, with MM 2.1? > I do this via synchronisation. A script that calls add_member/remove_member