So throught the last couple of Mailman releases (I'm currently running
2.1.3), my digest log file stay empty (even though I have users in
digest mode).
Anyone know why that is? I'm assuming that at least something should
be written there when a digest is generated, etc., no?
- Mark, curious
-
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Dan Phillips wrote:
> I am unable to to reproduce those problems. Is this a new update to
> 2.1.3 from a 2.0.x version? If so, then the problem is most likely the
No, I tried with a clean installation from Mailman sources.
> users in question need to clear all old mailma
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 05:16 am, Jonathan Bentley wrote:
Hi,
I've successfully installed mailman on our server and have created a
test list
or two. While I can access the list through the web interface, all
the links in
the main menu have the wrong url, so I cannot modify any of
Hi,
I've successfully installed mailman on our server and have created a test list
or two. While I can access the list through the web interface, all the links in
the main menu have the wrong url, so I cannot modify any of the list settings.
For us, mailman is accessed through a url rese
Vivek Khera wrote:
> "PHB" == Paul H Byerly writes:
PHB> I have heard a rumour that AOL's new spam filters are rejecting
PHB> mail that has URLs as dotted quad addresses. If your server is
no rumor. they say they do it on their "postmaster" web site.
Actually it says they "may" reject t
hello,
I've one problem with the wrapper. When I use the command :
/usr/lib/mailman/mail/wrapper post list-toto
the log is :
"Cannot read wrapper configuration file."
What's the solution ? I can't find it.
I use mailman 2.0.13-60 with postfix.
alex.
---
This is possible when user is not logged in but when logged there will be
a request to unsubscribe user "x" for list admin. So.. it's a bug =) I
also tested it on 2.2.3.
--
Pasi Sjöholm
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Pasi Sjoholm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I set up a mailman today and now I have a little pro
Hello,
I set up a mailman today and now I have a little problem. I have this
corporate mailing list and I have set unsubscribe_policy to yes for that
list but still users can unsubscribe via web gui after they have clicked
the unsubscribe and confirmed that they really want to unsubscribe via
Vivek Khera wrote:
"PHB" == Paul H Byerly writes:
PHB> I have heard a rumour that AOL's new spam filters are rejecting
PHB> mail that has URLs as dotted quad addresses. If your server is
no rumor. they say they do it on their "postmaster" web site.
Since I'm not hiding "dotted-q
Under Privacy Options in the web-admin there is a setting that indicates
which list names are acceptable. Make sure it is set to only allow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (or whatever).
HtH - Jon Carnes
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 14:16, Merle Reine wrote:
> It does appear that whatever mailing list you create, i.
> "PHB" == Paul H Byerly writes:
PHB> I have heard a rumour that AOL's new spam filters are rejecting
PHB> mail that has URLs as dotted quad addresses. If your server is
no rumor. they say they do it on their "postmaster" web site.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ppl,
just installed mailman, made my way through the configuration and got
stopped, two issues:
I want to use the email interface only, no web interface at all (maybe i
integrate it later on). Is this possible? What would be entered in the
web_page_u
Just saw this today. May not be related, but still something to be aware of.
220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not
220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer
220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk
220- e-mail sent
Oscar,
Here are some things to check.
1. General Options. Is Emergency Moderation set to Yes?
2. Membership Management. Moderation Bit. Could it be that some
members have the moderation bit set? You could check Off and Set it for
everyone.
3. Privacy Options -> Sender Filters. There are
It does appear that whatever mailing list you create, i.e. list1 is
available to all domains and virtual domains.
For example,
I have domain1, domain2, domain3.
I create a mailing list of cust_help . I can then email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This not ver
We have had significant issues with AOL's new "filters". These filters
also seem to attack certain MIME configurations. While we haven't had
significant issues with Mailman per se, we have had with our web log
reporting engine which builds all those lovely charts and graphs into a
MIME encode
FreeBSD 4.7-Rel
Python 2.2.1
Sendmail 8.12.6
I'm still getting this daily on a number of
cron driven jobs.
Running the ~mailman/bin/list_lists script by hand as
user mailman also returns the same error.
Is there a way to repair the pickle file?
> cPickle.UnpicklingError: member is not safe for
Ryan wrote:
Has there been any resolution to the AOL mailer issue?
Is there an issue, and if so what is it? I have setting that match
those which were reported to be a problem and mail goes to AOL just
fine. I have several hundred AOL users receiving mail on a dozen lists,
and yet my AOL
The problem is that I don't want to moderate the messages, but they are coming up for
me to moderate them. I do have the option under membership management set to 'no' and
I don't see anywhere else I can set this list to be unmoderated. Can you point me to
the category it is under?
Thanks.
O
Leith,
I suppose you could use Samba instead of NFS to share drives with
Windows machines. Samba 3.0 is out and worth looking at.
Tussing, Leith wrote:
My question is, is there a way to run the web interface from another web server (preferably not using the NFS method because all of the other
Here is something odd (or maybe it is supposed to be this way).
I setup mailman for virtual domains and when I added a new mailing list
via the web interface, it answered mail for the new domain.
i.e.
I added domain2 as a virtual domain and there is no option to choose
which domain the list is
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 04:09 pm, Tussing, Leith wrote:
If this is a repetitive question I apologize for that. I looked and
was unable to find anything useful on this topic to help me.
We're in the process of setting up a mailman server for some of our
clients for the first time.
O
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 11:18 AM, Pablo Chamorro C. wrote:
I found that Mailman 2.1.3 has a serious bug, accessing to the private
mailman archives and the membership options page, when a user changes
his
password. The web authentication simply fails.
The other bug is this: the email c
I found that Mailman 2.1.3 has a serious bug, accessing to the private
mailman archives and the membership options page, when a user changes his
password. The web authentication simply fails.
The other bug is this: the email command 'set delivery' (on/off) doesn't
work.
Please, read the complete
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:54:58PM -0500, Pascal Blanchette wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version available
> as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11?
> Version 2.1.3 is marked as unstable. Is the new version still in beta or is
> it ready to be deploye
If this is a repetitive question I apologize for that. I looked and was unable to
find anything useful on this topic to help me.
We're in the process of setting up a mailman server for some of our clients for the
first time.
Our boss wants to give the clients access to the web interface, but we
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 00:18, Oscar E. Cabeza wrote:
> Hi. I'm having trouble finding the setting to set whether the messages are to
> be approved or not. I'm using Mailman 2.1.2 Can anyone help?
>
> Thanks a million.
>
> Oscar
That functionality is in multiple places, but if you want *all* mes
I'm not a Debian guru, but I imagine that the reason 2.1.3 is not
available on stable is that it simply has not been out long enough.
Also, version 2.1.3 requires a relatively modern version of Python on
the server.
The real question to ask the Debian guru's is: why aren't they using
version 2.0.1
Hi everyone,
I know this is a newbie question but...
How do I move a Mailman archive from one host to another ?
Thanks in advance
Marcel Pamphile
http://carec.org
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailma
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 17:54, Pascal Blanchette wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version available
> as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11?
Debian has a strange terminology. They tend to use "stable" where other
people would use "obsolete".
Many of the pa
Pascal Blanchette said:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version
> available as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11?
> Version 2.1.3 is marked as unstable.
That is just the way Debian is. "Stable" is ultra conservative. "Testing"
has more recent packages.
Jon,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:27:13AM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
> > How dangerous is it to muck with the locks directory of a mailman
> > install?
> > I'm trying to figure out why my mailman installation doesn't send
> > messages through. [...]
> > I'm wondering if there might be
A number of subscribers to a mailing list did not receive messages for the
past couple of days do to a spam block. I'd like to create a digest from
this week's archive file and send it to them. Is there anyway to create a
digest from the archive files? For reasons too complicated to explain, we
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version available
as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11?
Version 2.1.3 is marked as unstable. Is the new version still in beta or is
it ready to be deployed on a production site. In other words, would you
recommend upgrading fr
I'm having a terrible time with the 2.1.2 upgrade.
Ever since the upgrade, anyone using Microsoft Exchange Server receives
messages as an attachment. So, using the new Content Filtering feature, I
set filtering to Yes and instructed Mailman to convert text/html parts to
plain text. This seeme
Thanks a lot Richard,
That was exectly the problem... I had a 2.0 installation from the SuSE
distribution that I installed right over with the 2.1.3 from source.
After wiping out the old 2.0 via rpm and re-installation of 2.1.3,
everything works perfectly well!
Anders Norrbring
Norrbring Consu
36 matches
Mail list logo
