Hi Mark,
Thx for your email. Actually I tried that method, but I got some errors
/usr/bin/sudo: /usr/local/sbin/mailman.aliases: command not found
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/mailman/bin/genaliases", line 116, in ?
main()
File "/usr/local/mailman/bin/genaliases",
Diana Huang wrote:
>
>I am a novince to Mailman. I followed the steps to install Mailman 2.1.5 in RH
>Linux 9. It works pretty well except I have to add a bunch of aliases for a
>list to /etc/aliases. I tried David Champion's mm-handler method to save my
>manual work, but I got unknown user when
Hi All,
I am a novince to Mailman. I followed the steps to install Mailman 2.1.5 in RH
Linux 9. It works pretty well except I have to add a bunch of aliases for a
list to /etc/aliases. I tried David Champion's mm-handler method to save my
manual work, but I got unknown user when I try to send a
Kris Vassallo wrote:
>
>On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 18:04, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Since you have verified that the listname-owner address actually works,
>> It seems there may be a problem with the way the listname-owner
>> address is obtained for the notification.
>> Do you have access to bin/withlist?
Kris Vassallo wrote:
>
>Approved messages hit the list with no problem. Also things such as
>notifications that people subscribed to the list and list creations
>generate emails to the owner just fine.
Actually, hold and 'moderator requests' notices are created via a
different method than the sub
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 16:46, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >Just an update, I sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I have
> >successfully received the message, so from my understanding, the alias
> >is not messed up.
>
> I replied before I saw this. OK, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address
> works at least for ex
Kris Vassallo wrote:
>Just an update, I sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I have
>successfully received the message, so from my understanding, the alias
>is not messed up.
I replied before I saw this. OK, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address
works at least for external mail. You didn't say, but I gues
Kris Vassallo wrote:
>I am experiencing a problem where the moderators and/or the list admins
>are not getting notifications regarding things like mail being held and
>I am wondering what I am doing wrong.
>
>admin_immed_notify is
>set to yes and I have also tweaked the file that sends out remi
Just an update, I sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I have
successfully received the message, so from my understanding, the alias
is not messed up.
-Kris
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 16:25, Kris Vassallo wrote:
> I am experiencing a problem where the moderators and/or the list admins
> are not gettin
I am experiencing a problem where the moderators and/or the list admins
are not getting notifications regarding things like mail being held and
I am wondering what I am doing wrong.
If I send mail to the list as a non list member, the mail gets held, I
(the non list member) get a response via em
At 9:38 PM +0100 2005-06-14, Andy Heath wrote:
> The issue it raises is maintenance. If FC does
> it differently then it means users are
> dependent on FC providing updated packages
> or working hard to manually do that mapping
> with updated code.
> Effectively it becomes an FC package not
At 4:08 PM +0100 2005-06-14, Andy Heath wrote:
> If the mailman developer community adopts the FHS for
> mailman then that's a different story entirely and
> I would follow without complaint.
SELinux and the FHS are both specific to a particular OS --
Linux. We have to support dozens
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 21:38 +0100, Andy Heath wrote:
> Is there guidance in the standard mailman distributions
> on how to build for FC starting with a tar.gz ?
To the best of my knowledge the install document provided in the tar
ball applies equally well to Fedora thus it is not necessary to have
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Andy Heath wrote:
>
>>If the mailman developer community adopts the FHS for
>>mailman then that's a different story entirely and
>>I would follow without complaint.
>
>
> In fairness to John Dennis, he did raise these issues for discussion
> last year on the Mailman-Develop
Andy Heath wrote:
>
>If the mailman developer community adopts the FHS for
>mailman then that's a different story entirely and
>I would follow without complaint.
In fairness to John Dennis, he did raise these issues for discussion
last year on the Mailman-Developers list. See threads at
http://mai
SER.RI-TIC - Jordi Tomàs Boqué wrote:
>
>today we found this Bug. Version of Mailman is 2.1.5. Maybe new version
>solve problem ?
>
>thanks.
>
>-
>Jun 14 11:38:54 2005 admin(1293):
>
>admin(1293): [- Mailman Version: 2.1.5 -]
>admin(1293): [--
Jean-Philippe GIOLA wrote:
>
>I want to use an another archiver for mailman like monharc or pipermail
>(or one that i 'm developping) and i want to know if , when a mail is
>sent to a list, the external archiver will treat all the mbox file of
>the list or only the mail that was just sent ?
As
>>OFF-TOPIC below:
>>
>>Standards compliance (fedora) is one thing (I work in standards)
>>but when everyone already has a fine standard (put it in the
>>mailman user directory) and the community has no plans
>>to change that then i find it very silly to just throw
>>that away
>
>
> The director
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 09:50 +0100, Andy Heath wrote:
> If someone could do an ls -R or ls -lR (if there are links)
> of a 2.1.5 mailman directory and post it it would help figure
> out where fedora puts all the pieces (I'll build a list of
> links from it so it looks like a normal mailman director
Hi,
today we found this Bug. Version of Mailman is 2.1.5. Maybe new version
solve problem ?
thanks.
-
Jun 14 11:38:54 2005 admin(1293):
admin(1293): [- Mailman Version: 2.1.5 -]
admin(1293): [- Traceback --]
admin(1293): Traceback
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Andy Heath wrote:
>
>>so how does "subject:.*[SPAM}.*" (admitredly meaning s or p etc) trigger
>>the behaviour but "subject.*spam" not trigger it ?
>
>
> Because on the second and subsequent passes through it is looking at
> the subject of the notice to the owner which cont
Hi all!
I want to use an another archiver for mailman like monharc or pipermail
(or one that i 'm developping) and i want to know if , when a mail is
sent to a list, the external archiver will treat all the mbox file of
the list or only the mail that was just sent ?
best reguards.
--
Jean-Ph
22 matches
Mail list logo
