Lars Anderson wrote:
>
>I'm seeing the same thing. It works OK as long as the body of the
>message is us-ascii, but if it contains characters like æøå
>(iso-8859-1) the message is printed in the archive as quoted printables
>(litteraly) and the link is mangled like reported by the OP.
>
>The me
At 18:23 10/28/2005, you wrote:
>Jared Rimer wrote:
>
> >I don't have my copy any more, but this has been the problem since
> >we've moved. Shall I re-enable the option to send notifications and
> >when I get another one send it to the list?
>
>You can do that.
>
>If you're willing to experiment,
Jared Rimer wrote:
>I don't have my copy any more, but this has been the problem since
>we've moved. Shall I re-enable the option to send notifications and
>when I get another one send it to the list?
You can do that.
If you're willing to experiment, answers to the following questions
would
I don't have my copy any more, but this has been the problem since
we've moved. Shall I re-enable the option to send notifications and
when I get another one send it to the list?
At 17:51 10/28/2005, you wrote:
>Jared Rimer wrote:
>
> >Nark and all,
> >This is all we have.
> >> >From: [EMAIL P
Jared Rimer wrote:
>Nark and all,
>This is all we have.
>> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:46:54 -0500
>> >X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
>> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abus
Horse,
Go to privacy, I don't remember if its sender or recipient
and turn off implicit destination.
At 17:08 10/28/2005, you wrote:
>Hi All
>
>This is my first post to the list but I've been lurking for a while.
>I'm running Mailman 2.1.5 on a debian sarge box with exim 4, apache 1.3
>et
Horse wrote:
>
>I post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the post goes out to all members including
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] but there it gets held for approval by the list admin
>(i.e. me). The reason given is:
>
>"Blind carbon copies or other implicit destinations are not allowed. Try
>reposting your message
Nark and all,
This is all we have.
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:46:54 -0500
> >X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it
> >with
Hi All
This is my first post to the list but I've been lurking for a while.
I'm running Mailman 2.1.5 on a debian sarge box with exim 4, apache 1.3
etc. at home. I also have an account with a hosting company which
provides mailman 2.1.5 lists and a fairly standard mailman control
interface.
My
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
>We'd like to set one of our lists up so that permanent/fatal errors
>(such as invalid mailbox, unknown user, unknown host) would immediately
>get unsubscribed, while temp fails (such as mailbox full, try again
>later, etc.) will simply go through the normal motio
Jared Rimer wrote:
> I'm running on a domain of mine that has Mailman
>installed. The hosting provider moved the account to another server
>he runs. Ever since, the notify when subscribers added has not
>worked correctly. We've received bounce notifications disabling the
>one admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>I tried with "aw.rezoperso.net".
>so my Email Mailing-List becomes : "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>and when I send a Email with the above email,
>I receive this message :
>"user '[EMAIL PROTECTED]" not known
>
>If I create this user (# adduser starinux) only the account "[EMAI
Hi all,
I'm running on a domain of mine that has Mailman
installed. The hosting provider moved the account to another server
he runs. Ever since, the notify when subscribers added has not
worked correctly. We've received bounce notifications disabling the
one admin because of too ma
send an E-mail to the request address of the list with who password
where password is the password you set to the list.
At 20:56 10/27/2005, you wrote:
>i am having serious problems with mailman.
>we have nearly 700 members on our mailing list, and only some people are
>getting mail.
>i have revie
> >My domain is : "rezoperso.net"
> >My hostname is : "aw.rezoperso.net"
> >But how to create the name of The Email adress of the ML "starinux" ?
> If you look at the General Options page for the list, I think you'll
> find host_name is '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. It should not be this.
> It should probab
We'd like to set one of our lists up so that permanent/fatal errors
(such as invalid mailbox, unknown user, unknown host) would immediately
get unsubscribed, while temp fails (such as mailbox full, try again
later, etc.) will simply go through the normal motions.
With that, we have a f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>I installed "Mailman" on my computer.
>(+ Apache and Postfix)
>My domain is : "rezoperso.net"
>My hostname is : "aw.rezoperso.net"
>
>Everything works fine when I create my mailing-list named : "starinux".
>
>But how to create the name of The Email adress of the ML "star
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>David wrote:
> >
> >One more thing. If people are on moderation is there some place to set
> >it that they dont get notification of being moderated and their message
> >is just held without them knowing it.
>
>
>No. If member_moderation_action is hold or reject, the member is
Hallo,
I installed "Mailman" on my computer.
(+ Apache and Postfix)
My domain is : "rezoperso.net"
My hostname is : "aw.rezoperso.net"
Everything works fine when I create my mailing-list named : "starinux".
But how to create the name of The Email adress of the ML "starinux" ?
When I register a
Change the length in KB a message is before posting in general to 0
for no limit. If I remember the setting.
At 10:55 10/26/2005, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We use this software and continue to get the following error message
>(see below). Is there anything that can be adjusted in order to
>send larg
One other thing that hasn't been mentioned, but all the answers in this
thread apply to replies to non-digest messages. Digests always have
Reply-To: the list posting address.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use yo
Ren Bucholz wrote:
>
>So I created a
>modified add_members and swapped this line:
>
>> mlist.ApprovedAddMember(userdesc, ack, 0)
>
>with this one:
>
>> mlist.AddMember(userdesc, remote="Webpage")
>
>Running the new script on the command line generates this:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] echo [EMAIL PROTE
It's Friday afternoon so forgive me a little tongue-n-cheek humor :-)
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 12:54 -0600, Mike Cisar wrote:
> Rule #1 in configuring sendmail... if it's working don't touch it :-)
Corollary #1 follows from Rule #1:
sendmail configuration is so painful it can't be changed readily.
Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>I must be coming across as really thick and stupid. If I have set the tag to
>reply to poster, and I hit reply, then there is no way of mailman knowing
>which email address that came from
I'm not sure what you mean by this, but Mailman is not really involved
here other th
Thanks very much to John for his advice on this. I've implemented it,
and am now facing a slightly different problem.
For those just tuning in, I'm using MM 2.1.5 and trying to add new list
subscribers via the command line (so users don't see the default MM
templates and I have control over th
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 16:39:01, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing the same thing. It works OK as long as the body of the
message is us-ascii, but if it contains characters like æøå
(iso-8859-1) the message is printed in the archive as quoted printables
(litteraly) and the link is mangled li
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>2)You can configure your web server to add a
>
>Robots: noindex,nofollow
>
>header when it delivers the pages.
>
>3)You can edit the various arch*.html and article.html templates to add
>a
>
>
>
>tag. See
>http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq04.048.htp
>f
I must be coming across as really thick and stupid. If I have set the tag to
reply to poster, and I hit reply, then there is no way of mailman knowing
which email address that came from
So in simple terms, if I put up a subject on the mailing list and I don't
want people to reply, it is better to
Hi Mark,
> >I'm hoping someone on the list may be able to tell me if this a) is
> >really a one-liner and b) roughly where to look at inserting the
> >'one-liner' in order to acchieve the required result.
>
> Well, maybe a two liner :)
>
> Aside --
> Actually, John Denn
Jack R. Madderra wrote:
>Other than setting the archives to private are the any other recommended
>methods of preventing these Bots from accessing the list archives?
1)You can use a robots.txt file. Google 'robots.txt' for info.
2)You can configure your web server to add a
Robots: noindex,nofol
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>If you don't want this, and you DO want to allow list members in
>general to post, then you have to arrange for the list posting address
>to NOT appear in the To: or Cc: headers of the posts which you CAN NOT
>do.
Not quite correct. You can post by addressing the list in Bcc:
Other than setting the archives to private are the any other recommended
methods of preventing these Bots from accessing the list archives?
Jack
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ma
Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>
>I am totally confused, can you explain this please?
>
>
>Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended
>for most mailing lists.
>
>
>Poster
>
>This list
>
>Explicit address
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Please can you explain this bit, for me, if this i
Hi Mark,
I am totally confused, can you explain this please?
Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended
for most mailing lists.
Poster
This list
Explicit address
Please can you explain this bit, for me, if this is set to poster, why does
everyon
Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>As far as I was aware I had set it up, so what ever reply they
>hit it will direct the reply to the poster, and not to the list.
The only way to do this is to enable Full Personalization for the list
which you may not be able to do (It requires that the Mailman
installatio
Mike Cisar wrote:
>
>What I would like to do is do a one-shot conversion of all the users to the
>new domain name and then internally to mailman, when the message is first
>submitted into the mailman process simply have a regex replacement of the
>sender's domain name so even though the message mig
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 09:30 -0600, Mike Cisar wrote:
> At this point the mail server is configured to respond to both domains, and
> treat them as the same. Mailman itself is configured to use the new domain
> both on the web side, and all the lists have been changed to use that as
> their preferr
Hi Hannah,
I apologise for my comments earlier on. I am getting very little support
from my service provider on this issue. I am getting complaints from users
of the list. As far as I was aware I had set it up, so what ever reply they
hit it will direct the reply to the poster, and not to the lis
I have a corporate customer who is in the process of migrating all of their
users and services from one domain to another (lets say
reallyreallyreallylongandhardolddomain.com to newdomain.com). Because they
are quite large, and not centralized they estimate that it will be about a
month before the
Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>
>Please for novices around her don't use jargon. I sent the original
>message, and the message stating reply to poster.
Perhaps the users are using 'reply all' or 'group reply' as I've done
here instead of simple reply.
If you don't want users to be able to post to the
On Thursday 27 October 2005 10:18 pm, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> >On Thursday 27 October 2005 08:32 pm, you wrote:
> >> This message comes from postfix and is telling you it doesn't know how
> >> to deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is quite likely that your
> >> aliases are not con
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:11:34PM +0100, Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>Hello,
>Please for novices around her don't use jargon.
You get what you pay for.
And I think one can expect for people to educate themselves.
>[...]
Kind regards,
Hannah - slightly annoyed by that attitude of entitleme
Hello,
Please for novices around her don't use jargon. I sent the original
message, and the message stating reply to poster.
Kind Regards
Mark
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.org] On Behalf Of Hannah Schroeter
Sent: 28 October 2005 12:51
To: mailm
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:39:27PM +0100, Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>It they hit reply, it is redirecting the email to the list, this should not
>be the case. I have set the option to poster, so why does it post to the
>list.
Perhaps the original poster set "reply-to" to the list address.
T
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:40:14PM +0100, Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>MUA = ?
Mail user agent.
Kind regards,
Hannah.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: h
MUA = ?
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.org] On Behalf Of Hannah Schroeter
Sent: 28 October 2005 10:39
To: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Help
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:53:03AM +0100, Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>Please ca
It they hit reply, it is redirecting the email to the list, this should not
be the case. I have set the option to poster, so why does it post to the
list.
Kind Regards
Mark
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.org] On Behalf Of Hannah Schroeter
Sent: 2
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:53:03AM +0100, Mark.A.Lombardo wrote:
>Please can someone help me? I have set a distribution list using mailman and
>my isp. I have set the replies to poster, but the whole list is receiving
>the replies, and it is annoying members of the list. Please people have
Please can someone help me? I have set a distribution list using mailman and
my isp. I have set the replies to poster, but the whole list is receiving
the replies, and it is annoying members of the list. Please people have
discussed the confidentially issue.
Kind Regards
Mark
-
49 matches
Mail list logo
