Re: [Mailman-Users] [SOLVED] Re: Mailman won't send messages?

2006-02-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dennis Carr wrote: The problem, as I discovered completely by accident, is that the list owner also needs to be subscribed to the list - this is not automatically done in 2.1.5, which is what is current in Debian Sarge. I don't know why that would be a problem unless the problem was that the

Re: [Mailman-Users] delivery to Prodigy

2006-02-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
Jeff Donsbach wrote: Has anyone out there had any problems with their lists where messages were not being delivered to subscribers on Prodigy? My prodigy users receive list posts OK. I have one user on Prodigy (small lists) that says he hasn't received any list emails for a while now. I

[Mailman-Users] Can't Delete Corrupt Subscriber Address

2006-02-25 Thread Tim
We are using Mailman v 2.1.4 on a Linux box with postfix and I am site admin. We have a subscriber address that has /t on the end of it ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/t) which can only be seen when dumping the lists config file. The subscriber address looks normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]) when looking for it

Re: [Mailman-Users] installation problems - newlist-issues

2006-02-25 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark == Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mark Henrik wrote: On 2/24/06, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then maybe someone put it in Defaults.py. Let's hope Mandrake is not distributing its package this way. They are, I'm afraid. Mark :-( With all due

Re: [Mailman-Users] Integrating Mailman with Spamassassin

2006-02-25 Thread John Fleming
On Thursday 23 February 2006 16:36, Jon D. Slater wrote: I've been using Mailman for some time, and just recently installed SpamAssassin on my Fedora Core 4, Linux machine. Spam-assassin would normally be used with the MTA (i.e. exim, qmail, etc.) and not Mailman. Basically, you should be

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't Delete Corrupt Subscriber Address

2006-02-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
Tim wrote: We have a subscriber address that has /t on the end of it ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/t) which can only be seen when dumping the lists config file. The subscriber address looks normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]) when looking for it using any other method (list members, etc). Do you mean '\t', i.e.