On 17 Jun 2006, at 22:35, Gerrit Bosch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry to bother you out there with this newbie question:
> Is it possible to change the portnumber for the webinterface to
> anything else than 80?
See under heading "Non-standard web server ports" on:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/fa
Hmm, well, after going through the FAQ, I think its working again, for some
reason restarting it with mailmanctl instead of service mailman restart
seems to have done the trick. At least I think thats what fixed it, I could
be wrong about that.
Thanks for your help Mark!
Scott
On 6/17/06, M
Gerrit Bosch wrote:
>
>Sorry to bother you out there with this newbie question:
>Is it possible to change the portnumber for the webinterface to
>anything else than 80?
>Thus avoiding interference with another webserver on the same subnet.
To make the links on the Mailman web pages include the
Hello,
Sorry to bother you out there with this newbie question:
Is it possible to change the portnumber for the webinterface to
anything else than 80?
Thus avoiding interference with another webserver on the same subnet.
Couldn't find the answer in the FAQ's.
Thanks,
Gerrit Bosch.
ideeinbeeld.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>Also, as I look more closely at the original traceback, it is unusual
>in that entries usually only have the pid and yours say 'mailowner
>(pid)', and I don't know what 'mailowner' is.
>
>What do your sendmail aliases for Mailman look like? Normally, they all
>pipe to /var/mai
Scott Thomson wrote:
>
>This is the bounce message we're getting by the way:
>
>The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 6/16/2006 5:28 PM
>The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not
>report a specific reason. Check the addres
On 6/17/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Scott Thomson wrote:
> >
> >Thanks for the ideas, now I feel like I'm getting closer to the issue.
> >
> >check_perms came up clean, all the files in the in dir match these
> >permissions.
> >
> >2302ff99d3a89dc936c9e66497cb08201f0.pck
> >-rw-r
Scott Thomson wrote:
>
>Thanks for the ideas, now I feel like I'm getting closer to the issue.
>
>check_perms came up clean, all the files in the in dir match these
>permissions.
>
>2302ff99d3a89dc936c9e66497cb08201f0.pck
>-rw-rw1 mail mailman 10043 Jun 17 14:08
>1150567685.345078+9
Scott Thomson wrote:
>So I upgraded mailman and sendmail yesterday, I'm running RHEL3 on a machine
>out at serverbeach. The latest mailman is 2.1.5 via Red Hat Network.
>
>Now that I've upgraded to the latest versions of both available via up2date,
>I'm getting errors when sending to a list.
>
>T
So I upgraded mailman and sendmail yesterday, I'm running RHEL3 on a machine
out at serverbeach. The latest mailman is 2.1.5 via Red Hat Network.
Now that I've upgraded to the latest versions of both available via up2date,
I'm getting errors when sending to a list.
This is what is in my /error l
Todd C. Williams wrote:
>I have volunteered to train people on the use of Mailman version 2.1.7.cp2
>for PMI Portland (http://www.pmi-portland.org/).
>
>I do not understand the "Privacy options." "Sender filters", entry "List of
>non-member addresses whose postings will be automatically discard
I have volunteered to train people on the use of Mailman version 2.1.7.cp2
for PMI Portland (http://www.pmi-portland.org/).
I do not understand the "Privacy options." "Sender filters", entry "List of
non-member addresses whose postings will be automatically discarded". I
have entered an addres
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Lawrence Bowie wrote:
>
>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>>What does scripts/paths.py now contain?
>>>
>>
>># -*- python -*-
>>
>># Copyright (C) 1998-2003 by the Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>#
>># This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>># modify it unde
13 matches
Mail list logo
