Hi all,
I am running a small mailman list and have a couple of non-member submissions
(99.5% spam, but occasionally a genuine message from a member using an
alternative email address) per day. The default of mailman is hold and at
the end of the day I discard them after a check.
Recently I
Charles Stroom wrote:
Recently I noticed that such senders are being notified that their submission
is being on hold and I would like to stop that. Is there an option
somewhere to do so and keeping hold as default? I have been unable to find
it. (Mailman 2.1.6)
It's
SPAM, as always is a hot topic and I may on the wrong forum, but...
All the addresses on the website have been picked up by spammers, and they are
sending a picture of a message that gets by filters. I can stop the SPAM to
the mailman newslist with moderation, but my problem really falls to
Hello, all
I need to create multiple listserv that have exactly the same
settings, except the names. I'm not sure that it is possible to
duplicate settings across multiple listserv. What's problems I may
run into if I duplicate the settings?
Thank you very much,
Hung Phan
Network
Hung Phan wrote:
I need to create multiple listserv that have exactly the same
settings, except the names. I'm not sure that it is possible to
duplicate settings across multiple listserv. What's problems I may
run into if I duplicate the settings?
The normal way to do this is to run
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Martin Dennett wrote:
I've just been mailed by one of my users to say that the archive for my
list is not up to date. Having just checked prior to sending this, I
found that by clicking on the Date link for this month, the last
message written to it is nearly a week
Hello,
I am working on a customized user management system created in
python/Zope. Currently I am using the bash script in mailman/bin to
communicate with Mailman, but I like to do a little bit more (which is
also possible with the withlist script) and in the main time speed
thinks up by python
on Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:00:05 PDT
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Stroom wrote:
Recently I noticed that such senders are being notified that their
submission
is being on hold and I would like to stop that. Is there an option
somewhere to do so and keeping hold as default?
Mark Sapiro sent the message below at 12:37 10/27/2006:
Hung Phan wrote:
I need to create multiple listserv that have exactly the same
settings, except the names. I'm not sure that it is possible to
duplicate settings across multiple listserv. What's problems I may
run into if I duplicate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
I am working on a customized user management system created in
python/Zope. Currently I am using the bash script in mailman/bin to
communicate with Mailman, but I like to do a little bit more (which
(Mailman 2.1.9 Fedora 5)
newlist --help says:
Note that listnames are forced to lowercase.
That doesn't seem to be true.
I just ran
bin/newlist test
but my listinfo web page shows this as Test.
It also shows up as Test in the General Options
web page.
If I look at the Details for
Jon Forrest wrote:
newlist --help says:
Note that listnames are forced to lowercase.
That doesn't seem to be true.
The confusion is there are two list names. The internal list name which
is the name of the list's sub-directory in Mailman's lists/ directory,
and the name which is used in URLs
Mark Sapiro wrote:
A newly created list will be given an initial real_name = to the all
lower case internal name except the first character will be Upper case
if it's a letter. This name is used in some messages and on the
listinfo page.
I'm wondering what the reasoning for this is. If
Jon Forrest wrote:
What got me worried was the signature in messages that come from my list.
It said:
---
Test mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, given that my MTA (Postfix) is case sensitive, if somebody
replied to the email address on the last line of the
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Are you sure your postfix aliases for Mailman are case sensitive. I
doubt it. Try mailing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect both messages will get posted to
the list.
You are 100% right. I did NOT know this!! All these years
of misinformation...
Jon Forrest wrote:
My intuition tells me that programs shouldn't change the case
of user-supplied data unless there's a very good reason for
doing so, and it's clear that it's happening. But, you
are clearly the expert in this area.
I understand your point and it seems valid. I can't speak to
16 matches
Mail list logo
