Re: [Mailman-Users] New Mailman Installation - Can't Send Email to aNew List (reformatted)

2006-11-12 Thread McJathan
Brad Knowles wrote: I've read through your entire message, and your questions seem to be more related to how to get virtual domains working correctly in postfix using MySQL, and don't seem to have much to do with using Mailman in that context. Have you tried asking your questions on the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Getting notified for subscription bounce

2006-11-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
Tsai Li Ming wrote: Lastly, can the list owner simply receives all bounces? If I remember correctly, setting the bounce processing to No simply ignore all bounces? Yes, setting bounce_processing to No ignores all bounces for the list. You can forward all bounces to the list owner or anywhere

Re: [Mailman-Users] New Mailman Installation - Can't Send Email toaNew List (reformatted)

2006-11-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
McJathan wrote: Here are the entries from our mm_cfg.py file: from Defaults import POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS=['domain1.net', 'domain2.net'] MTA='Postfix' add_virtualhost('mail.domain1.net', 'domain1.net') MAILMAN_SITE_LIST='mailman'* Are the values for

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam, spamcop and mailman moderation

2006-11-12 Thread John A. Martin
Brad == Brad Knowles Re: [Mailman-Users] spam, spamcop and mailman moderation Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:56:36 -0600 Brad At 11:17 AM -0500 11/11/06, John A. Martin wrote: Perhaps amend Charles' suggestion to also provide a response when a specified regular expression is found in the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Difficulties with mailman 2.1.5

2006-11-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brad Knowles wrote: At 3:47 PM -0500 11/11/06, Alan McConnell wrote: Brad has covered this pretty well, but here's a bit more. 1. It often takes two or more repetitions to log on to the administrative page. I am always careful about typing my password. On first blush, this sounds a

[Mailman-Users] Temporary local problem - please try later

2006-11-12 Thread J.R. Constance
I am seeing the following error in my smtp-failure log Nov 12 18:33:44 2006 (18367) All recipients refused: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': (451, 'Temporary local problem - please try later')}, msgid: mailman.1.1163260804.9656.constituent-society- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nov 12 18:33:44 2006 (18367)

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam, spamcop and mailman moderation

2006-11-12 Thread Brad Knowles
At 12:11 PM -0500 11/12/06, John A. Martin wrote: I suspect you would agree that otherwise action should not be recommended to be taken based upon the data contained in header fields. I would agree that the RFC guidelines

Re: [Mailman-Users] Temporary local problem - please try later

2006-11-12 Thread Brad Knowles
At 8:43 PM -0700 11/12/06, J.R. Constance wrote: I have something like 18 lines in the failure log either with this 451 error or with s. Any idea what could be causing this? I've been using Unix and the Internet for over twenty-two years, a professional Unix system administrator for

Re: [Mailman-Users] Temporary local problem - please try later

2006-11-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
J.R. Constance wrote: I am seeing the following error in my smtp-failure log Nov 12 18:33:44 2006 (18367) All recipients refused: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': (451, 'Temporary local problem - please try later')}, msgid: mailman.1.1163260804.9656.constituent-society- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nov 12

Re: [Mailman-Users] Temporary local problem - please try later

2006-11-12 Thread Thomas Hochstein
Brad Knowles schrieb: I've been using Unix and the Internet for over twenty-two years, a professional Unix system administrator for over seventeen years, and specializing in managing Internet e-mail systems for over fourteen years. Congratulations, this is a first -- I don't recall

Re: [Mailman-Users] Temporary local problem - please try later

2006-11-12 Thread J.R. Constance
I am using Exim, and here is the corresponding error from the exim_rejecting log for this smtp-failure entry. 2006-11-12 18:33:44 H=localhost (frodo.clshost.com) [127.0.0.1] sender verify defer for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: error in redirect data: missing or malformed local part (expected word or

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam, spamcop and mailman moderation

2006-11-12 Thread stephen
Brad Knowles writes: At 10:23 AM +0900 11/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The second is that for a bounded cost[1], you can implement signed mail. For dozens of years, we've been telling people that once they have enough RAM and fast enough disk drives, the single biggest