I am befuddled.
mailman-2.1.8-0.FC4.1 (from RPM)
Fedora Core 4 (kept up to date with nightly yum)
postfix-2.2.2-2 (from RPM)
This is an established list server that has had one functioning list
(albeit very low volume, so I can't swear that it is still working).
I added a new list, put myself an
At 8:44 PM -0700 2/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since you guys aren't working with either Sendmail or Solaris, I think
> it would be best for me to walk through and record the entire process,
> and give that to you as a basis for inclusion where and however you
> want to use it.
The iron
The esteemed Barry Warsaw has said:
>
> Thanks Hank. I haven't used Sendmail in 20 years, so if there is
> some specific text you'd like to see added (or preferably a patch to
> the latex file), please feel free to send it directly to me and I'll
> push up a doc update.
>
Barry (and Mark)
At 2:16 PM -0600 2/27/07, Dan Good wrote:
> Where can I find more information concerning the uses of aliases and
> some examples?
That's going to depend on your MTA.
We have a little information in the Mailman documentation, the FAQ
Wizard, etc... but most of the useful information will proba
Where can I find more information concerning the uses of aliases and
some examples?
Dan Good
On Feb 27, 2007, at 7:43 AM, Kelly Jones wrote:
> On 2/22/07, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 6:43 PM -0700 2/22/07, Kelly Jones wrote:
>>
>>> My question: what's the best way to handle
At 6:43 AM -0700 2/27/07, Kelly Jones wrote:
> I'd also like members of 'sysops' to decide whether they want "message
> to 'sysops' awaiting approval" or not. If I make it an alias, everyone
> will get these emails. If I send it to a mailing list, I can setup a
> topic so that only people who
Martin Hagelin wrote:
>
>I've set up spam filtering rules in Mailman that will throw away messages
>that match ^X-Spam: YES in the headers. This works fine with most of the
>spam but messages that are sent to the *-subscribe address are accepted
>and not rejected.
>
>This means that mailman sends o
On 2/22/07, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 6:43 PM -0700 2/22/07, Kelly Jones wrote:
>
> > My question: what's the best way to handle a situation like this? Have
> > a list owned by itself or "effectively" owned by itself.
>
> What I've done in situations similar to this, is to make
Hi,
I'm using Mailman v. 2.1.9 on a Debian Linux platform. I'm running Exim4
as the MTA with spamassassin doing spam checking when messages are recived
in Exim (Exiscan-acl).
I've set up spam filtering rules in Mailman that will throw away messages
that match ^X-Spam: YES in the headers. This wor
