Hi,
I'm using Mailman v. 2.1.9 on a Debian Linux platform. I'm running Exim4
as the MTA with spamassassin doing spam checking when messages are recived
in Exim (Exiscan-acl).
I've set up spam filtering rules in Mailman that will throw away messages
that match ^X-Spam: YES in the headers. This
On 2/22/07, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 6:43 PM -0700 2/22/07, Kelly Jones wrote:
My question: what's the best way to handle a situation like this? Have
a list owned by itself or effectively owned by itself.
What I've done in situations similar to this, is to make the
Martin Hagelin wrote:
I've set up spam filtering rules in Mailman that will throw away messages
that match ^X-Spam: YES in the headers. This works fine with most of the
spam but messages that are sent to the *-subscribe address are accepted
and not rejected.
This means that mailman sends out
At 6:43 AM -0700 2/27/07, Kelly Jones wrote:
I'd also like members of 'sysops' to decide whether they want message
to 'sysops' awaiting approval or not. If I make it an alias, everyone
will get these emails. If I send it to a mailing list, I can setup a
topic so that only people who want
Where can I find more information concerning the uses of aliases and
some examples?
Dan Good
On Feb 27, 2007, at 7:43 AM, Kelly Jones wrote:
On 2/22/07, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 6:43 PM -0700 2/22/07, Kelly Jones wrote:
My question: what's the best way to handle a
At 2:16 PM -0600 2/27/07, Dan Good wrote:
Where can I find more information concerning the uses of aliases and
some examples?
That's going to depend on your MTA.
We have a little information in the Mailman documentation, the FAQ
Wizard, etc... but most of the useful information will
The esteemed Barry Warsaw has said:
Thanks Hank. I haven't used Sendmail in 20 years, so if there is
some specific text you'd like to see added (or preferably a patch to
the latex file), please feel free to send it directly to me and I'll
push up a doc update.
Barry (and Mark)
Just
At 8:44 PM -0700 2/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you guys aren't working with either Sendmail or Solaris, I think
it would be best for me to walk through and record the entire process,
and give that to you as a basis for inclusion where and however you
want to use it.
The ironic
I am befuddled.
mailman-2.1.8-0.FC4.1 (from RPM)
Fedora Core 4 (kept up to date with nightly yum)
postfix-2.2.2-2 (from RPM)
This is an established list server that has had one functioning list
(albeit very low volume, so I can't swear that it is still working).
I added a new list, put myself
