Re: [Mailman-Users] Permission issues

2007-03-07 Thread Mark Sapiro
Stefan Berglund wrote: > >Now I got some user/group issues.. It complains about postfix running the >scripts(?) as "nobody" instead of "mailman". Some googling tells me that >this is kindof common, and that postfix should use the same identity as the >owner of the aliases file...? > >Right now I ha

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Brad Knowles
At 2:08 PM -0700 3/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd really call a sendmail receiving site that blocks dynamic IP mail > as "misconfigured," when virtually all of the mail coming from such > IP's is spam. On the python.org mail system, we do not accept e-mail from sites that don't have pro

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 7, 2007, at 4:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Barry, I'm going to disagree with you on this one. Virtually all of > the spam that gets through the various filters on my box comes from > big-service dynamic IP's right here in the US. Hi Hank

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 7, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote: > Yes. When ISPs first started blocking dynamic IPs, I was adding > them one > at a time to /etc/postfix/transport like this: > > .rit.edusmtp:smtp-server.rochester.rr.com > rit.edu smtp:smtp-

[Mailman-Users] Permission issues

2007-03-07 Thread Stefan Berglund
Hi again, thanks for the help w/ my previous problem.. However, I had messed it up a bit, so I reinstalled it (postfix + mailman) :-) Now I got some user/group issues.. It complains about postfix running the scripts(?) as "nobody" instead of "mailman". Some googling tells me that this is kindof co

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread vancleef
The esteemed Barry Warsaw has said: > > Which ISP do you use? I have a static IP from my cable company but > they refuse to give me an rDNS entry. In every other way, I really > like them, but I do get bounces occasionally from people's (IMHO) > misconfigured MTAs who don't accept mail fro

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Paul Tomblin
Quoting Barry Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Mar 7, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote: > >I tried to get around that by sending my outgoing mail through my > >ISP's outgoing mail server (using Postfix's "relayhost = > >[smtp-server.rochester.rr.com]"), but then my ISP wouuld decide I'd > >sen

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Brad Knowles
At 1:40 PM -0500 3/7/07, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Maybe you know Paul: I looked a long while back and never found a > good answer, but can Postfix set a relayhost on a per-recipient > basis? IOW, for the one or two domains that block me because of my > funky reverse DNS, I'd like to relay them t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 7, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote: > I tried to get around that by sending my outgoing mail through my > ISP's > outgoing mail server (using Postfix's "relayhost = > [smtp-server.rochester.rr.com]"), but then my ISP wouuld decide I'd

Re: [Mailman-Users] ISPs and rDNS [was: Trouble with mailman external responses]

2007-03-07 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Actually, when I first started using my own MTA, I just configured the > MTA's primary host name as netblock-68-183-193-239.dslextreme.com, and > things worked well except for earthlink.net. I don't kn

Re: [Mailman-Users] sendmail and solaris stuff

2007-03-07 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since you guys aren't working with either Sendmail or Solaris, I think > it would be best for me to walk through and record the entire process, > and give that to you as a basis for inclusion wh

[Mailman-Users] True virtual hosting patch for 2.1.9

2007-03-07 Thread noc
Hi, I've applied mailman-vh-2.1.7.patch from http://nix.lauft.net/mailman/ to my mailman 2.1.9 (running on fedora core 5). But I can't create same list name on different domains ... where should I look to fix this problem ? Any tips or logs ? Thanks ! ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] ISPs and rDNS [was: Trouble with mailman external responses]

2007-03-07 Thread Mark Sapiro
Barry Warsaw wrote: > >Which ISP do you use? I have a static IP from my cable company but >they refuse to give me an rDNS entry. In every other way, I really >like them, but I do get bounces occasionally from people's (IMHO) >misconfigured MTAs who don't accept mail from cable rDNSs. I us

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Paul Tomblin
Quoting Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Paul has addressed your main question. I just want to add that you may > have problems trying to run Mailman from a server with a dynamic IP. > Earthlink.net for one will not accept your mail. The same is true for > some smaller ISPs. They don't like IPs w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 7, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Paul has addressed your main question. I just want to add that you may > have problems trying to run Mailman from a server with a dynamic IP. > Earthlink.net for one will not accept your mail. The same

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Mark Sapiro
Stefan Berglund wrote: >Hello, I'm trying to set up mailman along with postfix to be able to create >my own mailllists at home.. I use a dyndns, which I'd like to use for the >mail list URL (is that possible??) - boffman.mine.nu. Paul has addressed your main question. I just want to add that you

Re: [Mailman-Users] header

2007-03-07 Thread Paul Tomblin
Quoting Gerson Rino Prantl Oaida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi, > > I have the mailman with freebsd and postfix. > My hostname is "host.domain.com", and the list is > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", but I want "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". > > I can´t remove de host of header. Try sending email from that host without

[Mailman-Users] Mail delivery fails with "(-2, 'Name or service not known')"

2007-03-07 Thread noc
Hi, I'm in trouble. I've read the FAQ and everything about it on mailman site. My problem is described in the FAQ (6.14) : http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq06.014.htp I see these log entries in smtp-failure: Dec 22 21:03:29 2004 (1060) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] fai

[Mailman-Users] header

2007-03-07 Thread Gerson Rino Prantl Oaida
Hi, I have the mailman with freebsd and postfix. My hostname is "host.domain.com", and the list is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", but I want "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I can´t remove de host of header. Anyone can help me? Gerson Oaida === Aviso de confidencialidade: ===

Re: [Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Paul Tomblin
Quoting Stefan Berglund ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > That is, if I send a mail to some "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from an > external mail account, something goes wrong.. For some reason it uses the > result from gethostname()(?) as address in the mail ( > blahblah.bredband.comhem.se) instead of boffman.mine.nu.

[Mailman-Users] Trouble with mailman external responses

2007-03-07 Thread Stefan Berglund
Hello, I'm trying to set up mailman along with postfix to be able to create my own mailllists at home.. I use a dyndns, which I'd like to use for the mail list URL (is that possible??) - boffman.mine.nu. It seems to work fine, I can send mail between users on the machine, locally.. I can send mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] How to PRESERVE multipart/mixed format

2007-03-07 Thread Brad Knowles
At 2:50 PM +0200 3/6/07, andReadG wrote: > The link is correct and everything works in the > end, but I would prefer the original attachment to > remain within the original mime multipart message! The sending of any kind of MIME/HTML format e-mail is a really, really bad idea. It's bad enoug