Hi
Is there a mailman command that dumps the current running configuration
options?
I have been having trouble with the --with-mail-gid=mailman option and errors
reports. I am wanting to check whether I am getting the errors messages. This
means either --with-mail-gid=mailman is not set OR
On Thursday 19 April 2007 05:01:42 David Southwell wrote:
Hi
Is there a mailman command that dumps the current running configuration
options?
I have been having trouble with the --with-mail-gid=mailman option and
errors reports. I am wanting to check whether I am getting the errors
Hi
On a list the email address for the list owner was changed.
1. When logging on to admin/listname the old owner run by address is shown on
the Administrator Authentication page.
2. Clicking on the run by address in the Administrator Authentication page
causes the old address to be passed to
--On April 18, 2007 9:55:48 PM -0500 Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the nearly twenty years I've been doing this sort of stuff, I don't
think I've ever ran into a single NFS environment that I would call
well-managed. Some were not as badly managed as others, but they all
had
On Thursday 19 April 2007 06:05:38 Steve Burling wrote:
--On April 18, 2007 9:55:48 PM -0500 Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the nearly twenty years I've been doing this sort of stuff, I don't
think I've ever ran into a single NFS environment that I would call
well-managed. Some
I have some users who post the same message to multiple lists. They are
on these lists. And they want to see each copy of the message from each
list. That way they know the lists are working.
Recently they've noticed that although the messages show up in the
archives, they are not getting a
I'm running mailman 2.1.5 on RH FC3.
Okay, I've searched the list and have read through many posts. I've read the
FAQ about what to check
(http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.014.htp).
Checked
everyone and made sure all was working: crons, mailmanctl, etc. Qrunner is
Hi All--
There's a FAQ entry on importing archives. However, if the
instructions are followed, the existing list.mbox would be overwritten
with an old archive. That surely cannot be right. Can I put it
someplace else in order to import it? Shouldn't I lock the list while
running bin/arch?
At 5:01 AM -0700 4/19/07, David Southwell wrote:
Is there a mailman command that dumps the current running configuration
options?
Did you search the FAQ Wizard or the documentation? Did you see FAQ 4.9?
--
Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED], Consultant Author
LinkedIn Profile:
At 5:23 AM -0700 4/19/07, David Southwell wrote:
1. When logging on to admin/listname the old owner run by address is shown on
the Administrator Authentication page.
2. Clicking on the run by address in the Administrator Authentication page
causes the old address to be passed to mail
At 12:14 PM -0400 4/19/07, McNutt Jr, William R wrote:
Recently they've noticed that although the messages show up in the
archives, they are not getting a copy of the message from each list,
only the first one.
My guess is that they're using Google, which has this helpful
concept of
At 12:17 PM -0400 4/19/07, Richard Healy wrote:
Mail is being received and passed to mailman and placed in
the mailman queue - where it sits.
If the mail is getting into the Mailman queue and not being
processed, that tells me that the inbound queue runner is either not
At 10:53 AM -0600 4/19/07, Ivan Van Laningham wrote:
There's a FAQ entry on importing archives. However, if the
instructions are followed, the existing list.mbox would be overwritten
with an old archive.
No, I don't think so. It just reads from the specified mbox file, or
from the
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 12:17 PM -0400 4/19/07, Richard Healy wrote:
Mail is being received and passed to mailman and
placed in
the mailman queue - where it sits.
If the mail is getting into the Mailman queue and not being processed,
that tells me that the inbound
On Thursday 19 April 2007 12:35:28 Brad Knowles wrote:
At 5:23 AM -0700 4/19/07, David Southwell wrote:
1. When logging on to admin/listname the old owner run by address is
shown on the Administrator Authentication page.
2. Clicking on the run by address in the Administrator
On Apr 19, 2007, at 3:30 PM, David Southwell wrote:
This seems to be a bug where the [list-owner_ID] is not being properly
maintained. I realize I have a possible clue that may help someone
who is
familiar with mailman's logic. The original email address for the
owner was
given in
Calvin Muller wrote:
I have followed every one of those posts that state the problem in ubuntu
but there is no fix for it that I can seem to find, If you know how to
correct these issues I would greatly appreciate it.
Did you see my actual post which is archived at
Karl Zander wrote:
Is there a away to place a list member on hold. That
is, set them to nomail and prevent them from logging in
to change back to getting mail. Of course we can
unsubscribe the member. We have a need to sometimes
review a member's membership status on the lists. The
David Southwell wrote:
Is there a mailman command that dumps the current running configuration
options?
If you mean the options specified to configure when the software was
initially configured, the answer is No. Some options are evident in
certain settings in Defaults.py, but --with-mail-gid
David Southwell wrote:
On a list the email address for the list owner was changed.
How?
1. When logging on to admin/listname the old owner run by address is shown on
the Administrator Authentication page.
Sounds like a page cached in a proxy.
2. Clicking on the run by address in the
At 4:05 PM -0400 4/19/07, Richard Healy wrote:
Apologies. I didn't copy and paste enough of the log file. Looks like
all the qrunners are going (evidenced by a ps aux | grep python as well).
Ahh, okay. I misunderstood. Nevermind.
If you've got all the queue runners going, I have no
At 1:30 PM -0700 4/19/07, David Southwell wrote:
UMPh - nothing like the circumstances referred to in any of the FAQ,s which
focus on the need for reauthentication . The circumstances I describe, have
nothing to do with that issue as the need for re-authorization does not
occur.
Those
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 12:14 PM -0400 4/19/07, McNutt Jr, William R wrote:
Recently they've noticed that although the messages show up in the
archives, they are not getting a copy of the message from each list,
only the first one.
My guess is that they're using Google, which has this
Brad Knowles wrote:
If you've got all the queue runners going, I have no idea why
incoming mail would just be sitting in the queue and not being
processed.
Maybe Mark Sapiro or Tokio Kikuchi can help.
Is your 'in' queue sliced? I.e., do you have anything involving
QRUNNERS in mm_cfg.py? Or
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:53 AM -0600 4/19/07, Ivan Van Laningham wrote:
There's a FAQ entry on importing archives. However, if the
instructions are followed, the existing list.mbox would be overwritten
with an old archive.
No, I don't think so. It just reads from the specified mbox
Gents:
I am going INSANE!!!Below are 3 different examples of footers sent out with
posts from just 3 out of the dozen+ Lists I have behind cPanel. I have spent
HOURS
trying to find differences between the 3 for the settings for footers and
their HTML
sending and CANNOT!!
Not sure if the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going INSANE!!!Below are 3 different examples of footers sent out
with posts from just 3 out of the dozen+ Lists I have behind cPanel. I have
spent HOURS
trying to find differences between the 3 for the settings for footers and
their HTML
sending and CANNOT!!
On Apr 19, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
A list admin can set a member to nomail and change the
members password so the member can't log in, but there's no way for a
list admin without additional access to the Mailman installation to
find the original password before changing it so it
28 matches
Mail list logo
