Re: [Mailman-Users] moved lists and now they don't work

Mark Sapiro wrote: >>drw-rw 736 root mailman 25024 Jun 26 19:55 .. > > >This is the permission on /private/var/mailman/archives/private. You >need g+sx. Also, in order for public archive access to work, you >probably need o+x. > >If you look again at >

Re: [Mailman-Users] moved lists and now they don't work

carconni wrote: > >I know you guys aren't excited to hear this but it's running on an >xserve. I think there may have been an error in how I was told to >move mailman... > >does this look right? > >corp-admin2:/private/var/mailman/archives/private root# ls -la ops.mbox/ >total 80 >drwxrwsr-x

Re: [Mailman-Users] moved lists and now they don't work

Hi, I know you guys aren't excited to hear this but it's running on an xserve. I think there may have been an error in how I was told to move mailman... does this look right? corp-admin2:/private/var/mailman/archives/private root# ls -la ops.mbox/ total 80 drwxrwsr-x 3 root mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] moved lists and now they don't work

carconni wrote: > >I'm still having trouble... > >I removed everything in /private/var/mailman/archives/public/ but >Mailman didn't replace the symlinks and when I tried to create the >symlinks, Mailman got really confused. My lists are down and I don't >know how to recover them. > >corp-adm

Re: [Mailman-Users] Member only list?

Leslie Herps wrote: >> >> The problem is the list is not explicitly addressed in the To: or Cc: >> headers of the post. > >Right! >That was it. Since the rackstar system is designed for virtual hosting, I >made it so each list gets a unique name. So that multiple sites can have a >list called "inf

Re: [Mailman-Users] moved lists and now they don't work

Hi, I'm still having trouble... I removed everything in /private/var/mailman/archives/public/ but Mailman didn't replace the symlinks and when I tried to create the symlinks, Mailman got really confused. My lists are down and I don't know how to recover them. corp-admin2:/private/var/mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Member only list?

> >> > The reason it is being held: > >> > > >> > Message has implicit destination > >> > >> Have you read http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py? > >> req=show&file=faq01.009.htp > >> regarding this message? > > Reread item 2) (one sentence) in FAQ 1.9. > > The problem is the list is not e

Re: [Mailman-Users] post formatting and timing

Mark Sapiro writes: > I don't know if there is a standard that says your MUA 'should' > recognize a single in the decoded text as a line break, Since it's in UTF-8, Unicode does, Technical Annex #14. Conformance is required by Unicode 4.0. Of course if the MUA doesn't claim conformance to Un

Re: [Mailman-Users] Member only list?

Leslie Herps wrote apparently in response to an off list message: > >> > The reason it is being held: >> > >> > Message has implicit destination >> >> Have you read http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py? >> req=show&file=faq01.009.htp >> regarding this message? > >Thanks for this link. > >I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Member only list?

Hi Dan, > > The reason it is being held: > > > > Message has implicit destination > > Have you read http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py? > req=show&file=faq01.009.htp > regarding this message? Thanks for this link. It is not an umbrella list (or am I mistaking umbrella for something el

Re: [Mailman-Users] Member only list?

Hi Mark / mailman user list, Hope you still remember me. Sorry, been VERY busy... Below is a brief summary of our previous exchange of mails. Beneath it are my finding whilst debugging some more... > >> What is the reason why the post is held? You will find the reason in > >> the admindb interfac

Re: [Mailman-Users] post formatting and timing

Hi All-- Mark Sapiro wrote: > > I don't know if there is a standard that says your MUA 'should' > recognize a single in the decoded text as a line break, but of > five MUA's I just tried, four - Ultrafunk Popcorn 1.76, Mozilla > Thunderbird 2.0.0.4, MS Outlook Express 6 and Mutt 1.4.2.1i - all

[Mailman-Users] Mail from GioMBG > hack this into /etc/httpd/modsecurity.d/modsecurity_crs_30_http_policy.conf to alowed mod_security + mailman into fedora 7 moonshine with mod_security

MANY Thanks Jeffrey! SINCERLY! I have resolved with this hack into my: /etc/httpd/modsecurity.d/modsecurity_crs_30_http_policy.conf Simply I have commented: SecRule REQUEST_BASENAME as # SecRule REQUEST_BASENAME I think that is the minor hack to prevent this kind of apache+mod_security+mailman err

Re: [Mailman-Users] post formatting and timing

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >My guess (I haven't actually looked at the raw decoded message) is that >the decoded plain text has *nix only line endings as opposed to > endings. This would not violate RFC 2821 as the data on the >wire is the base64 encoded data, not the original text. I have now looked,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is it possible to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Brad Knowles wrote: >On 6/26/07, TRON478 wrote: > >> when i get a mail from my mail i can reply to the list via the adress >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> but i want to reply via >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> is this possible? > >This is a client problem. Agreed. See

Re: [Mailman-Users] post formatting and timing

Michael Welch wrote: >Hi again. The problem seemed cured, now I am getting garbled posts again. Here's my guess about the 'missing' line returns. The original posts in the "I lost my patch :-(" thread were in charset utf-8 and were base64 encoded. So were a couple of the posts in today's "expo

Re: [Mailman-Users] export list subscribers list

TRON478 wrote: > >is it possible to export the subscribers list of a list to a text, csv or >another file format? See . -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman-Users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 41

hey..pple.. me prat from india... can any one tell me wat is all you pple disscuss here.. i mean how it's important... i mean where it is used... i'll be really helpful to you.. thanks.. prat... > Send Mailman-Users mailing list submissions to > mailman-users@python.org > > To subscribe or

Re: [Mailman-Users] mail from GioMBG > fresh installation of mailman but Internal Server Error (only on edit some users) remain!

[mailed and posted] On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Gio MBG Canepa root wrote: Hi Mark! ---| Here the apache error Log: |--- [Tue Jun 26 17:03:00 2007] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] ModSecurity: Access denied with code 500 (phase 1). Pattern match ".(?:c(?:o(?:nf (?:ig)?|m)| s(?:proj|r)?|dx|

Re: [Mailman-Users] post formatting and timing

Thanks Brad & Dan for straightening me out. Kinda embarrassing, since I am a header watcher. Peace. Brad Knowles wrote at 09:29 AM 06/26/2007: >On 6/26/07, Michael Welch wrote: > >> Hi again. The problem seemed cured, now I am getting garbled posts again. >> >> Further, this post took a full 6

Re: [Mailman-Users] post formatting and timing

On 6/26/07, Michael Welch wrote: > Hi again. The problem seemed cured, now I am getting garbled posts again. > > Further, this post took a full 6 days to show up after I sent it. > > Maybe I am on moderation, and the moderator is slow at checking in. Or ?? Try checking your headers again:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Is it possible to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 6/26/07, TRON478 wrote: > when i get a mail from my mail i can reply to the list via the adress > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > but i want to reply via > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > is this possible? This is a client problem. There is nothing in Mailman that prevents you from replying to whatever

Re: [Mailman-Users] post formatting and timing

Hi again. The problem seemed cured, now I am getting garbled posts again. Further, this post took a full 6 days to show up after I sent it. Maybe I am on moderation, and the moderator is slow at checking in. Or ?? Michael Welch wrote at 07:04 PM 06/20/2007: >This list's posts started showing u

Re: [Mailman-Users] archRunner hogging CPU

Mark Sapiro wrote: > Anne Ramey wrote: > > >> Continued digging lead me to FAQ 4.41how recent is this. >> > > > Not very. The FAQ article is about 3 years old, and the list archive > thread it refers to regards a Mailman 2.0.11 installation > > > >> Does >> anyone else still run

[Mailman-Users] Problem with mailman and exim.

Hi, I am new at this list. I have a problem with mailman and exim: I create mailman list and then I receive the notificacion to admin email, then I create anyother list without problems, beeing notified by mailman, but I cannot receive mails to list, If I send any mail to list, I obtain no result

[Mailman-Users] mail from GioMBG > fresh installation of mailman but Internal Server Error (only on edit some users) remain!

Hi Mark! ---| Here the apache error Log: |--- [Tue Jun 26 17:03:00 2007] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] ModSecurity: Access denied with code 500 (phase 1). Pattern match ".(?:c(?:o(?:nf(?:ig)?|m)| s(?:proj|r)?|dx|er|fg|md)|p(?:rinter|ass|db|ol|wd)|v(?:b(?:proj|s)?|sdisco)| a(?:s(?:ax?|cx)|xd)|s(?

Re: [Mailman-Users] I lost my patch :-(

This list's posts started showing up with all the line returns ignored. None of my other emails are showing up this way. Not sure when it started, I have been on vacation. But I noticed it earlier today and decided to start watching it. Am I the only one? Tokio Kikuchi wrote at 06:35 PM 06/20/2

Re: [Mailman-Users] export list subscribers list

On 6/26/07, Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On 26. Juni 2007 08:55:54 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> is it possible to export the subscribers list of a list to a text, csv or > >> another file format? > > > > You can, but not via the webinterface: > > >

[Mailman-Users] Is it possible to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello, when i get a mail from my mail i can reply to the list via the adress [EMAIL PROTECTED] but i want to reply via [EMAIL PROTECTED] is this possible? thanks yavuz -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python

Re: [Mailman-Users] export list subscribers list

* Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's a feature that many of our listowners ask for. Fortunately there's > an alternative that doesn't require my help: the e-mail interface. You can > get a list of subscribers by sending a mail to listname-request with the > text > > who Ah, exc

Re: [Mailman-Users] export list subscribers list

--On 26. Juni 2007 08:55:54 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> is it possible to export the subscribers list of a list to a text, csv or >> another file format? > > You can, but not via the webinterface: > > ./list_members listenname That's a feature that many of our listowners