* Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 7/14/07, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Simple - yes. Effective? Depends on what you are after. By doing it this
way you are not really different from AOL, are you? You punish many users
just because some other are thoughtless and lazy. When I offer something,
* Dave Dewey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you use VERP to send out the mails? If you do that you can see who
the culprit is.
VERP doesn't work any longer for these, as of a couple months ago.
Damn! My last TOS notification dates back quite some time...
They now redact ALL information that can
Brandon Slaten wrote:
I just moved our Mailman lists to a new server. Accessing the listinfo
and admin pages works fine. After creating a new list mail sent to that
list is delivered. However mail set to the old lists, the ones that
were moved to this server, is not delivered.
What happens
Some additional information:
The old server:
Using Mailman version: 2.1.6
Compiled from src.
SunOS 5.8 Generic_117350-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-4
The new server:
Using Mailman version: 2.1.5
Installed from mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.5
Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 17:59:08 EDT 2007
Brandon Slaten wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Brandon Slaten wrote:
~mailman - /usr/lib/mailman
There is no lock, qfiles, or log directories there to look at to assess
items 6-8 in the link above.
In redhat 2.1.5, they may be in /var/mailman
(see below)
I did find the mentioned mailman logs in
OK, something I notice in my posts log is a message not entirely unlike
the following:
Jul 15 09:27:31 2007 (32571) post to list from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
size=5706, message-id=redacted, 557 failures
Now, as time progresses, that failures number counts down, and
ultimately, there is a success
unsubscribe
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives:
Quoting Christopher X. Candreva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Dave Dewey wrote:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow, maybe I'm just lucky.
Is your server on the AOL whitelist ?
Yep. I get very few complaints, 99% of them accidental, so for
me it's just a way to contact
Dennis Carr wrote:
OK, something I notice in my posts log is a message not entirely unlike
the following:
Jul 15 09:27:31 2007 (32571) post to list from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
size=5706, message-id=redacted, 557 failures
Now, as time progresses, that failures number counts down, and
ultimately,
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Brandon Slaten wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Brandon Slaten wrote:
~mailman - /usr/lib/mailman
There is no lock, qfiles, or log directories there to look at to assess
items 6-8 in the link above.
In redhat 2.1.5, they may be in /var/mailman
But OTOH, the fact that the lists
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
OK, so VERP is still the way to go, since the message-id is always
different
Do you mean the SMTP id in the first Received: (from Mailman) header?
You can get the recipient from your MTA log using this, but the
Message-ID: header is normally unchanged from the incoming
11 matches
Mail list logo
