Hi folks,
My name's Tony, and I'm the editor at the Royal Institute of Navigation here
in London. We used to run a couple of listservs for specific groups of our
members, but recently changed both our website and mail server, making these
listservs defunct. It turns out that our new mail server
Our Mailing List, list.nesae.org, has disappeared - Mailman says no such
list exists, our sign in info. isn't working. Anyone know what caused
this? How do i get it back?
thank you.
Pam
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Pam McKenna schrieb:
Our Mailing List, list.nesae.org, has disappeared - Mailman says no such
list exists, our sign in info. isn't working. Anyone know what caused
this? How do i get it back?
Contact nesae.org administrator and ask him if he/she changed anything
with virtual host
Hello everyone,
I'm running a
# rpm -q mailman
mailman-2.1.6-4.2
on a
# cat /etc/SuSE-release
SUSE LINUX 10.0 (i586) OSS
VERSION = 10.0
machine. Now everything works fine, except one thing: sending a mail
with a german umlaut in the subject line looks sometimes normal,
but sometimes it
On 11/27/07, Tony Fyler wrote:
I'm just looking for anyone with experience of installing Mailman to get in
touch with me to discuss the possibility of this job.
I'll be glad to talk to you about what's required, but I'm not
currently in a position to help with the actual installation and
I have read the FAQ about modifying the mm_cfg.py file to create a
more user friendly subject for confirmations. I implemented this
with my Mailman/Postfix setup. I mainly wanted it for Invitation
confirmations, but I understand that for newer versions of Mailman, it
works for other confirmations
Andre Tann wrote:
machine. Now everything works fine, except one thing: sending a mail
with a german umlaut in the subject line looks sometimes normal,
but sometimes it looks like this:
Jemand erhält Zuschlag für Einkauf
The sender is an Entourage on a Mac OS X. If the Mac-User
Christopher Adams wrote:
One question- Since the subject line is changed and replaces the
confirmation ID code with other text, does that mean that simple
replying to the message to confirmm will no work?
It will still work if your incoming MTA recognizes addresses of the form
[EMAIL
Pam McKenna wrote:
Our Mailing List, list.nesae.org, has disappeared - Mailman says no such
list exists, our sign in info. isn't working. Anyone know what caused
this? How do i get it back?
That is not a list, it is a host name. I'm not sure what the issue is,
but I can go to
Thank you for clarifying that. I assumed from the Postfix/VERP
configuration documentation (below) that the '+' delimiter would be
used regardless of entering it in the Postfix main.cf file. I should
tried adding it anyway, but I hadn't gotten to that step yet. Thanks,
it works as it should.
Christopher Adams wrote:
Thank you for clarifying that. I assumed from the Postfix/VERP
configuration documentation (below) that the '+' delimiter would be
used regardless of entering it in the Postfix main.cf file. I should
tried adding it anyway, but I hadn't gotten to that step yet. Thanks,
On 11/27/2007, Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes, one would think that, but you do need to set
recipient_delimiter = +
in main.cf, even though the Postfix document doesn't get to that until
much later.
No, you don't - this is the default... you only need to explicitly set
it if
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/27/2007, Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes, one would think that, but you do need to set
recipient_delimiter = +
in main.cf, even though the Postfix document doesn't get to that until
much later.
No, you don't - this is the default... you only need to
On 11/27/2007, Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 11/27/2007, Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes, one would think that, but you do need to set
recipient_delimiter = +
in main.cf, even though the Postfix document doesn't get to
that until much later.
No, you don't - this
On 11/27/07, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Quoting from http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html, aka 'man 5
postconf'
recipient_delimiter (default: empty)
That man page may or may not describe the current state of affairs,
and of course even if it does then you might be dealing with an older
Geez, now I don't know who to listen to. :). Anyway, my assumption
was wrong and I based it on the invitation confirmation not completely
working. Now it does and I thank you both.
One concern - Charles mentioned how 'expensive' it was to use VERP
with Postfix. I am wondering what kind of hit on
Christopher Adams wrote:
One concern - Charles mentioned how 'expensive' it was to use VERP
with Postfix. I am wondering what kind of hit on the responsiveness of
my Mailman server will be. I have over 500 lists and 250,000
subscribers. If VERP being used for Mailman causes more mail activity,
On 11/27/07, Christopher Adams wrote:
One concern - Charles mentioned how 'expensive' it was to use VERP
with Postfix. I am wondering what kind of hit on the responsiveness of
my Mailman server will be.
There has been some research on this topic, which is summarized at
On 11/27/07, Mark Sapiro wrote:
As a point of reference however, there are lots of lists on python.org
and some are quite busy (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and they are
personalized and it seems to work OK. Brad has posted on this in the
past
19 matches
Mail list logo
