Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Henrik Rasmussen writes:
Of course it's possible that the MUA is just inserting those headers
but it's a lie (the MUA thinks that's enough to let it get away with
just putting UTF-8 *anywhere*). But note that 0xF8 is illegal in
UTF-8 (for several reasons), so
Henrik Rasmussen wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Henrik Rasmussen writes:
Of course it's possible that the MUA is just inserting those headers
but it's a lie (the MUA thinks that's enough to let it get away with
just putting UTF-8 *anywhere*). But note that 0xF8 is illegal in
UTF-8 (for
Moving to -developers, reply-to set. Please keep Henrik in the loop.
Seems to be the same as
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1186819group_id=103atid=100103
Henrik Rasmussen writes:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Henrik Rasmussen writes:
Of course it's possible that
