Mark Sapiro writes:
> It appears non-standard in at least a few obvious ways, and I have no
> way to know in what others. You might find answers using Mandriva
> support resources
Mandrake always prided itself on the excellence of its user and admin
interfaces, and did not hesitate to change f
Frank Griffin wrote:
>
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> If you want to see what's behind that, you can do
>>
>> bin/dumpdb lists/webdata/config.pck
>>
>> and look at the actual values of the three attributes
>> first_strip_reply_to, reply_goes_to_list and reply_to_address.
>>
>>
>For the webdata list
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> It appears non-standard in at least a few obvious ways, and I have no
> way to know in what others. You might find answers using Mandriva
> support resources
>
>
I did before posting here, but found no bug reports there or on Google
which resembled this in any way.
There'
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Frank Griffin wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>> It wasn't the addition of [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the reply-to that made
>> me curious (I can see that this list does that as well), but the fact
>> that the second entry has the correct description but the wrong
>> address. Referenc
Frank Griffin wrote:
>
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> Why is it the To: address of the post?
>>
>
>You've got me. I'm assuming that all this stems from some anomaly in
>the upgrade that was done of the files copied from the old system.
It is clear to me that whatever Mailman this is, it is not the
Frank Griffin wrote:
>>
>It wasn't the addition of [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the reply-to that made
>me curious (I can see that this list does that as well), but the fact
>that the second entry has the correct description but the wrong
>address. Referencing my later post, it seems to be getting the
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Frank Griffin wrote:
>
>
>> Addenda: I set up a new list on the same host with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> as the owner and as a subscriber, and sent a post from
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the list.
>>
>> When [EMAIL PROTECTED] received the copy of the post, the headers were:
>>
>> F
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I'm not sure what's happening in total, but the '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is
> your own Reply-To: from the incoming post. The default is to add any
> additional reply-to address to that. If you want it removed, you need
> to set first_strip_reply_to to Yes.
>
> As far as the rest of
Frank Griffin wrote:
>Addenda: I set up a new list on the same host with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>as the owner and as a subscriber, and sent a post from
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] to the list.
>
>When [EMAIL PROTECTED] received the copy of the post, the headers were:
>
>From: Frank Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frank Griffin wrote:
>
>Thanks for the reply. I've recently gotten back to this and wanted to
>post my results.
>
>In addition to the steps you posted, I needed to run "withlist -a -l -r
>fix_url".
>
>However, I have one anomaly that still needs resolution:
>
>All of the lists I moved had the opti
Frank Griffin wrote:
>
> In this case, the list owner is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the
> poster is [EMAIL PROTECTED] . It seems to me that this ought to be
> WebData Project Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .
>
> Did I miss a step ? What can I do to correct this ?
Addenda: I set up a new list on the sam
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Frank Griffin wrote:
>> According to the UPGRADE document, file formats have changed as have
>> actual files (some new, some gone). What triggers the 2.1 version to do
>> the necessary conversions ? Is it just finding files of the old version
>> and recognizing them as such ?
>
Grigory Mokhin wrote:
>On 3/16/08, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> That's not the correct workaround. If you want to work around it, you
>> should change
>>
>>
>> elif msg.get_type() == 'multipart/mixed':
>>
>> to
>> elif msg.get_content_type() == 'multipart/mixed':
>
>Earlie
On 3/16/08, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's not the correct workaround. If you want to work around it, you
> should change
>
>
> elif msg.get_type() == 'multipart/mixed':
>
> to
> elif msg.get_content_type() == 'multipart/mixed':
Earlier in Decorate.py there is a line:
Grigory Mokhin wrote:
>I've installed 2.1.10b4 from scratch and I'm getting the following error:
>
>Mar 16 01:26:11 2008 (2076) Uncaught runner exception: Message
>instance has no attribute 'get_type'
>Mar 16 01:26:11 2008 (2076) Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/mailman/Mailman/Qu
I've installed 2.1.10b4 from scratch and I'm getting the following error:
Mar 16 01:26:11 2008 (2076) Uncaught runner exception: Message
instance has no attribute 'get_type'
Mar 16 01:26:11 2008 (2076) Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 114, in
16 matches
Mail list logo
