Re: [Mailman-Users] Robots Tag

2009-05-05 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sat, 02 May 2009 16:53:26 -0400 John Webb wrote: Hello John, > Thanks Brad. Any idea what I need to do to get index/follow into my You're welcome. > archives html? Mark has answered that. Which is great, 'coz I had no idea where to look! :-) -- Regards _ / ) "The

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman appends hostname to some address on maillist

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Tom Tilmant wrote: >I have been using mailman for several years with my current VPS provider. >About a month ago I started getting complaints from users that they were not >receiving e-mails. I have a spam problem with the server about the same time >and contribute most of the undeliverable becaus

Re: [Mailman-Users] Robots Tag

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
John Webb wrote: >Thanks Brad. Any idea what I need to do to get index/follow into my >archives html? See the FAQ at . More specifically, assuming you're only concerned about English language, find Mailman's templates/ directory. Create templates/site/ and templat

Re: [Mailman-Users] Digests more than once a day ... Whatdetermines it?

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Malcolm Austen wrote: >On Mon, 04 May 2009 18:36:56 +0100, Edward Ned Harvey > wrote: > >> Under what circumstances will a digest be created more than daily? > >If an individual message is large enough to trigger a digest. More precisely, if a message arrives which when added to all the prior,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Non-ASCII signs in welcome text

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Hendrik Maryns wrote: > >Indeed. The problem is that Mailman assumes a list is English by >default. If I create a new list, I start editing its settings. What >you see first, is the welcome message etc. Only afterwards, I click >through to the language settings and change it to German. This ca

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Barry S. Finkel wrote: >There has been some discussion (that I will not quote) about various >linux Mailman packages. I built a 2.1.12 package for Ubuntu based on >the SourceForge source and the Debian/Ubuntu 2.1.9 package. At that >time there were too many Debian patches that were undocumented.