On 8/12/2009 2:02 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> The Gentoo init script for mailman is pretty simple. It executes, as
> user 'mailman', "mailmanctl -s start", "mailmanctl stop" and "mailmanctl
> restart" for the standard init script arguments of start, stop and
> restart. That's all.
Mine stopped
Glenn Sieb wrote:
>Mark Sapiro said the following on 8/12/09 10:05 AM:
>
>> As Terry suggests, you could run bin/cleanarch as an additional
>> test/correction on the listname.mbox. There may be unescaped "From "
>> in message bodies that didn't confuse Mutt or that you didn't notice
>> with Mutt,
Bill Catambay writes:
> At 1:55 PM +0900 on 8/12/09, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
>
> >This can be done by setting up aliases as follows (pseudo-syntax, your
> >mileage will vary):
> >
> >foo-list: modera...@example.com
> >foo-list-moderated: | mailman post foo-list
> >
> >Tha
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Bill Catambay writes:
>
> > My ISP is using Mailman 2.1.11. Is that the latest? I'm guessing
> > no, since it is currently NOT recognizing the envelope sender. This
> > sounds like one that I'll need to contact my ISP for.
>
>No, it is not the latest, 2.1.12 is.
>
Hello, all
Have anyone run into this message:
Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning test-boun...@mailman.k12.or.us
does not designate 74.125.149.50 as permitted sender) client-
ip=74.125.149.50;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com:
domain of
Hung Phan wrote:
>
>Have anyone run into this message:
>Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning
>test-boun...@mailman.k12.or.us
> does not designate 74.125.149.50 as permitted sender) client-
>ip=74.125.149.50;
>Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com
Mark Sapiro writes:
> Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> >Bill Catambay writes:
> >
> > > My ISP is using Mailman 2.1.11. Is that the latest? I'm guessing
> > > no, since it is currently NOT recognizing the envelope sender. This
> > > sounds like one that I'll need to contact my ISP for.
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Mark Sapiro writes:
> > Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >
> > >Bill Catambay writes:
> > >
> > > > My ISP is using Mailman 2.1.11. Is that the latest? I'm guessing
> > > > no, since it is currently NOT recognizing the envelope sender. This
> > > > sounds like one tha
Mark Sapiro writes:
> Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >NB. "As he needs them to" means that the *list moderator* be
> >recognized as the *envelope sender*, and the message be approved in
> >that case.
> >Bottom line, a new feature is needed for his use case.
> I don't think so. Moderate.py ca
