On 2/21/2010 2:15 AM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>
> Bad news. I was not able to reproduce the problem on a VM, using
> backups from the day the problem first occured. And worse, this night,
> while I slept a troubled, disturbed sleep, dreaming of SMTP dialogues,
> the list roster changed (one new mem
On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>As expected, Postfix is not the culprit. Delivery to smtp-sink is
>running at the speed of molasses, too.
Now this is getting interesting .
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2010-February/068829.html
has some perplexing numbers.
Mark Sapiro writes:
> My question is the above logic implies that if the current message has
> an In-Reply-To and the replied to message is not in the archive, the
> message won't be threaded even if it has a References: to a message in
> the archive.
That's surely wrong.
> This occurs ofte
* Stefan Foerster :
> * Mark Sapiro :
> > As I said, I think it would just be the config.pck. Everything else is
> > open source software, but I don't think I want it. It's not that I'm not
> > curious because I definitely am, but I don't want to accidentally send
> > mail to any of the list member
