Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>I wouldn't mind adding the local domain in postfix, but definitely don't
>want to mess with patching MM myself and maintaining it. It's really
>only a cosmetic problem anyway that most likely no one else will ever
>see (how many people ever look at full headers?)...
>
>That said
LuKreme wrote:
>On 8-May-2010, at 15:38, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> 'Approved:(\s| )*Hon94Bar'
>
>how about
>
>Approved:([^<])*Password
>
>when searching the HTML portion?
>
>Or do you have to have the same search string for all portions?
No, I don't have to use the same pattern for all parts, bu
Ty Nelson wrote:
>
>Lord. Sorry. Duh. Postfix is what I use. Sorry, long day
>:)
I don't know off hand how to to what you want in Postfix and no one
else has jumped in, so I suggest you ask the question on a Postfix
list. The question is:
Mailman generates alias_maps for delivering it's list ma
Lee, Davis H wrote:
>
>As a part of a migration from OS X to Ubuntu, our list addresses changed
>from something like
>
>http://lists.example.pri/mailman/admindb/list_name
>
>to something like
>
>http://lists.example.pri/cgi-bin/mailman/admindb/list_name
>
>
>where the /cgi-bin/ is now listed.
TIA,
As a part of a migration from OS X to Ubuntu, our list addresses changed
from something like
http://lists.example.pri/mailman/admindb/list_name
to something like
http://lists.example.pri/cgi-bin/mailman/admindb/list_name
where the /cgi-bin/ is now listed.
In two places these
On 2010-05-09 5:29 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Note that I have never done exactly this, so I'm not totally certain it
> will do what you want, but I think it will. I also think it probably
> isn't worth maintaining a non-standard patch to do it, but only you
> can answer that for yourself.
I wouldn'
