[Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Cameron Smith
I am stuck trying to help a friend configure their setup. Their main domain has email handled by gmail so the mx for example.compoints to the google mail servers. They have a dedicated server that has postfix configured to handle mail for mailinglists.example.com. Mailman is set to use

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
Cameron Smith wrote: The problem I am having is mail from mailman is not making it to u...@example.com. Is this a mailman issue or a postfix issue? What does the Postfix log say? -- Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Cameron Smith
Thanks Julio! On an existing mailman list is there a way to see what those aliases should be? Cameron On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Julio Calvo jca...@dirinfo.unt.edu.arwrote: Is the aliases file correctly setup? When you create a list, mailman shows a list of aliases you have to include

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
Cameron Smith wrote: On an existing mailman list is there a way to see what those aliases should be? If you have the default MTA = 'Manual' setting Mailman's bin/genaliases will print a list of aliases. for all lists. OTOH if you have MailMan/Postfix integration configures with MTA = 'Postfix'

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Terri Oda
Is u...@example.com actually a gmail address? You may want to read this: http://wiki.list.org/x/2IA9 In short: if u...@gmail.com sends a message to the list, then u...@gmail.com won't get a copy. It's a gmail feature that complicates things when debugging using gmail addresses. Cameron

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Ivan Van Laningham
Hi All-- On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Terri Oda te...@zone12.com wrote: Is u...@example.com actually a gmail address? You may want to read this: http://wiki.list.org/x/2IA9 In short: if u...@gmail.com sends a message to the list, then u...@gmail.com won't get a copy. It's a gmail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ivan Van Laningham wrote: Not quite. The message is there, and is listed in the thread, but you'd never know it because gmail doesn't consider it a new message. This is what Google says, but my tests show it is not true. Are you sure you're just not seeing the original message in the Sent

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Ivan Van Laningham
Yup. I'm looking at the expanded version of this thread, and the message before your reply and after Terri Oda's is mine. It appears as Ivan Van Laningham to mailman-users, with my name in yellow (arbitrary color: yours is red, Terri's is purple, Cameron's is green). Now, gmail may, behind the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ivan Van Laningham wrote: Yup. I'm looking at the expanded version of this thread, and the message before your reply and after Terri Oda's is mine. It appears as Ivan Van Laningham to mailman-users, with my name in yellow (arbitrary color: yours is red, Terri's is purple, Cameron's is green).

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Ivan Van Laningham writes: Now, gmail may, behind the scenes, insert a link to the sent folder, but from a user's perspective it looks exactly like any other message in the thread, except that to the left of my name is a very small (i.e., 8x8 pixels) light grey round icon with a white x

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Postfix and Google Apps

2010-06-28 Thread Ivan Van Laningham
You are correct, Mark: I do _not_ see the footer for the list on my posts. So when I look at a thread that I've replied to, gmail only makes it LOOK like it comes from the list. Metta, Ivan On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote: Ivan Van Laningham wrote: Yup.