Lindsay Haisley writes:
> I would run swaks from the same box on which you run Mailman, and use -f
> with whatever Mailman uses as the envelope sender address for
> posts,
Wow, that's cool! Thanks for the tip!
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 15:10 -0400, Richard Shetron wrote:
> What arguments do you use to pretend to be mailman delivering to postfix
> with swaks?
I would run swaks from the same box on which you run Mailman, and use -f
with whatever Mailman uses as the envelope sender address for posts, If
you
Brian Carpenter wrote:
>
>I have come across some strange behavior that has me stumped. Here are
>the symptoms:
>
>1. List is moderated. When a moderated member's post is approved by a
>moderator, the post is sent to the list as expected.
>
>2. The post shows up in the Archives of the list.
>
>3.
Hi Everyone:
I have come across some strange behavior that has me stumped. Here are
the symptoms:
1. List is moderated. When a moderated member's post is approved by a
moderator, the post is sent to the list as expected.
2. The post shows up in the Archives of the list.
3. The post DOES NO
Judy Angel wrote:
>
>I have a list of 6000 users and I wish to change the setting for all
>subscribers to
>Conceal the member's address
>Acknowledge the member's posting
>I can see how to set it for new members but not existing existing members.
If you have command line access to the Mailman ins
David Westlund
>
>* If we store lock files on an NFS area and one node goes down without
>removing any locks, will the other node be able to start mailman?
It depends. If you run mailmanctl with the -s or --stale-lock-cleanup
option, it will remove the other master's lock. Note that mailmanctl
I have a list of 6000 users and I wish to change the setting for all
subscribers to
Conceal the member's address
Acknowledge the member's posting
I can see how to set it for new members but not existing existing members.
Thanks
Judy Angel
University of Hertfordshire
Hi
I am investigating doing a redundant setup of a mailman installation. We do not
care about load balancing, only fail over. I have read through all I can found
about this, including the following article on the FAQ:
http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030621
I am planning to so
On 10/25/2012 8:20 AM, Rodrigo Abrantes Antunes wrote:
>
>Ok, I was still getting the errors because in my hurry I put
> SMTP_MAX_RCPS instead of SMTP_MAX_RCPTS. I corrected this and restarted
> both mailman and postfix, now I don't get any errors in smtp-failure and
> in post I get this (with
Citando "Stephen J. Turnbull" :
Rodrigo Abrantes Antunes writes:
Searching google I found that this error isn't related to the number of
users in the list, it occurs because the total number of addresses in the
To: and Cc: headers of the post equals or exceeds
max_num_recipients.
10 matches
Mail list logo