I am recently having trouble posting messages to Ibiblio from my
ATT mail account. There have been issues lately with AOL and
Yahoo changing their headers, but I was not affected by this.
My email postings to Ibiblio are being rejected with the following error:
This is the mail system at host
sherwin writes:
mid...@lists.ibiblio.org: Command died with status 2:
/usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post midfex. Command output: Group
mismatch
error. Mailman expected the mail wrapper script to be executed as group
mailman, but the system's mail server executed the
On May 9, 2014, at 2:08 AM, sherwin sherwi...@att.net wrote:
I am recently having trouble posting messages to Ibiblio from my
ATT mail account. There have been issues lately with AOL and
Yahoo changing their headers, but I was not affected by this.
My email postings to Ibiblio are being
Le 09/05/2014 13:36, Larry Stone a écrit :
I assume you are just a user of a list at ibiblio.org? If so, you can’t fix
it. Ibiblio.org has Mailman installed incorrectly. They need to install it
correctly. This problem affects all lists managed by this Mailman
installation so I assume you have
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 15:42 -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote:
If I felt what my users were asking for was unreasonable, I wouldn't
have bothered to bring it here. They'd *like* to see who's posting so if
they *choose* to reply privately they can. In the past, this was easy
enough. The From: line was
I appreciate that the MailMan team is awesome doing the best that can be
expected given the new DMARC restrictions being forced on us all. Thanks guys!
FEATURE REQUEST:
A setting to configure the new From line. Instead of
FROM: Author_Name via ListName listn...@lists.example.com
I want to
On 5/8/14 12:02 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 05/08/2014 09:31 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
Question 1: Is it possible to reverse the order of approval and
confirmation when requiring both? The admin then can reject all those
with duplicates, only allowing the (presumably real) single subscription
On 05/09/2014 10:46 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
I temporarily removed the signup form from the listinfo page in hopes of
stemming the tide, and replaced it with a request to use the site's
contact form so that we can manually add interested subscribers. I
purposely don't have a subscribe
Lindsay Haisley writes:
What goes into an address comment is, or should be, purely
informational on a human level, and ignored on a computational
level.
Unfortunately, we can't depend on that:
There are a few possible mechanisms that attempt mitigation of
[display name] attacks,
Mark Sapiro writes:
They probably aren't using the subscribe form on the listinfo page but
rather posting the data directly to the subscribe CGI. Try moving
mailman's cgi-bin/subscribe aside to totally disable web subscribe.
Yeah, this seems like a different attack from the last one I
On 5/9/14 1:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 05/09/2014 10:46 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
I temporarily removed the signup form from the listinfo page in hopes of
stemming the tide, and replaced it with a request to use the site's
contact form so that we can manually add interested subscribers. I
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 04:01 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Lindsay Haisley writes:
What goes into an address comment is, or should be, purely
informational on a human level, and ignored on a computational
level.
Unfortunately, we can't depend on that:
The operational term is or
At Fri, 09 May 2014 14:12:57 -0500 Bill Christensen
billc_li...@greenbuilder.com wrote:
On 5/9/14 1:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 05/09/2014 10:46 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
I temporarily removed the signup form from the listinfo page in hopes of
stemming the tide, and replaced it with
At Fri, 09 May 2014 12:46:42 -0500 Bill Christensen
billc_li...@greenbuilder.com wrote:
On 5/8/14 12:02 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 05/08/2014 09:31 AM, Bill Christensen wrote:
Question 1: Is it possible to reverse the order of approval and
confirmation when requiring both? The admin
On 05/09/2014 12:12 PM, Bill Christensen wrote:
Is there a way that I can just have it affect this one problematic
list? If I change the name of cgi-bin/subscribe and any references to
it (at least until the next update), do you think that will make a
difference?
It seems to me the
I finally got around to testing this. I posted three times to my test
Yahoo group from 'Mark Sapiro my_aol_addr...@aol.com'. One post with
the group set to send replies to the group and one post with the group
set to send replies to the sender and one post with the group set to
send replies to the
Arguably, the correct response to DMARC filtering _should_ be the MIME
encapsulation of list mail, with appropriate RFC 2369 headers added to
the enclosing MIME structure leaving the content un-munged, with all
information from the original poster intact. Arguably, MUAs should be
transparent to
On 5/9/14, 10:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
Arguably, the correct response to DMARC filtering _should_ be the MIME
encapsulation of list mail, with appropriate RFC 2369 headers added to
the enclosing MIME structure leaving the content un-munged, with all
information from the original poster
Lindsay Haisley writes:
A nice fix, albeit probably total pie-in-the-sky, would be the
establishment of a MIME Content-Type: multipart/list-post, a variation
on (or extension of) mulpart/mixed. MUAs SHOULD (in the RFC 2119 sense)
effectively hide the outermost enclosing MIME envelope
Mark Sapiro writes:
I finally got around to testing this.
Thanks, Mark!
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy:
Richard Damon writes:
On 5/9/14, 10:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
The correct response is either for senders to stop publishing DMARC
policies that don't match the way their users use mail (fat chance),
or for recipient systems to skip the DMARC checks on mail from sources
that are
On 05/09/2014 07:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
But the wrapped message could pass the DMARC DKIM signature check, if it
will exactly matchs the message that came from Yahoo/AOL. (which the
phish won't). This says that the List Headers, modified subject, list
headers and footers should be added
On 05/08/2014 02:34 PM, Dave Nathanson wrote:
AFTER DEMARC, using the best settings for us that we can:
FROM: Author_Name via ListName everyb...@lists.example.com
TO: ListName everyb...@example.com
REPLY-TO: ListName everyb...@example.com
This is *pretty good* except that
* I don't
23 matches
Mail list logo
