On 06/24/2014 08:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>
> Getting a second regular subscription won't do anything, but I was
> suggesting adding a DIGEST subscription, which will arrive (eventually)
> and thus giving you confirmation that the message did go through.
As a Gmail user you can get "immediate"
On 6/24/14, 9:35 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
If you don't like this feature, you will have to use a different mail
service from GMail, or live with it. You may be able to work around
it by fiddling with the subscription address as Richard suggests, but
I bet it doesn't work (these are differe
I've gotten a dozen or more similar phishing messages. Shows how effective
DMARC is - NOT
Regards
Larry
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 24, 2014, at 9:51 PM, "Barry S. Finkel" wrote:
>
> I have in one of my mailboxes a scam from June 10 that has
>
> From: Chase Notification
>
> In the web M
Richard Damon writes:
> The internet protocols disagree on that minor modification create a new
> email.
No, they don't. There's only one RFC that matters, and that's RFC
5322 (or whichever version of that standard that you prefer, but on
this they're basically in agreement). RFC 5322 says:
Ron Guerin writes:
> I would really like to do, as someone said earlier, just say "Friends
> don't let Friends use Yahoo or AOL Mail." But count me in with those
> expecting Gmail to be next. That's nearly half the subscribers of the
> list I've been asking in regard to.
I think GMail would
I have in one of my mailboxes a scam from June 10 that has
From: Chase Notification
In the web MUA I use for this account, only the display name
Chase Notification
is shown on the screen as the sender. DMARC obviously will not
help in this case. I have no idea if the scammers are
willi uebelherr writes:
> now i think, it is clear. The feature "duplicate suppression" is a fix
> mechanism. I will wait for the answers of the people from the
> mailman-users list, what the say about. But in Gmail with a user
> configuration never i can resolve the problem.
That's right.
The internet protocols disagree on that minor modification create a new
email. For instance, EVERY step of mail deliver is REQUIRED to change
the headers of the message, so that would say every step should change
the Message-ID, which distorts some of its use.
The RFC's also say that if a mess
Dear William and Mark and all,
many thanks for your answer. I understand, that never you want to make
any special action for a specific task for Gmail.
But now, for me it is not a question of the specific "duplicate
suppression" from google-mail. it is a more general debate about the
princi
