On 04/03/2015 08:42 PM, JB wrote:
> I think I found a clue as to what the issue is.The page that renders has
> a title "LISTNAME: member options login page". I am guessing that this login
> page is NOT what is skinned by options.html (assuming that the actual page
> displayed t the member o
I think I found a clue as to what the issue is.The page that renders has a
title "LISTNAME: member options login page". I am guessing that this login
page is NOT what is skinned by options.html (assuming that the actual page
displayed t the member once logged on is what that template contro
Is there a template that will create a custom page at
http://www.mydomain.com/mailman/options/listname.html? I tried using
options.html but that did not see to do anything.
I was able to successfully create a custom list info page at
http://www.mydomain.com/mailman/listinfo/listname.html by u
On 04/03/2015 06:12 PM, Jan Steinman wrote:
>
> Is there an easy way to "sweep up" her address out of all the lists? I'm not
> to thrilled about using the web interface to go through every page in which
> this user might have been listed.
Mailman's bin/find_member (use the --help option for de
I have an irate user who keeps getting the Mailman month-end postings. I run
numerous low-volume lists, and she is probably on more than one.
Is there an easy way to "sweep up" her address out of all the lists? I'm not to
thrilled about using the web interface to go through every page in which t
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:02:03AM -0700, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 4/3/2015 4:55 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 08:09:12PM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> >>The consensus on most technical lists I've seen is very strongly in
> >>favor of bottom posting,
>
> >Perhaps you mean i
On 04/03/2015 06:25 AM, Danil Smirnov wrote:
> 2015-04-03 16:21 GMT+03:00 Danil Smirnov :
>>
>> It looks like this "http://"; action part appears in situation with many
>> subscribers only.
>>
>> If the subscribers number become higher than admin_member_chunksize,
>> and display mode switches to d
On 4/3/2015 4:55 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 08:09:12PM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
The consensus on most technical lists I've seen is very strongly in
favor of bottom posting,
Perhaps you mean interleaved or inline posting, as I've done here?
To the vast majority of
2015-04-03 16:21 GMT+03:00 Danil Smirnov :
>
> I've found another list with the same behavior.
>
> It looks like this "http://"; action part appears in situation with many
> subscribers only.
>
> If the subscribers number become higher than admin_member_chunksize,
> and display mode switches to di
I've found another list with the same behavior.
It looks like this "http://"; action part appears in situation with many
subscribers only.
If the subscribers number become higher than admin_member_chunksize,
and display mode switches to divided by letters, it stops working properly.
-
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:48:12AM +1100, Andrew Stuart wrote:
>
> What’s on your wishlist for the perfect Mailman web interface?
>
> If you can provide links to show where your ideas are done well that would
> help to illustrate your thoughts.
>
> Any killer features that you’d like to see in
Hi!
I've just created new mailing list and successfully configured it through
web UI.
Now I try to change some subscribers' params on page Membership Management.
But it does not work! (No changes appear recorded after form submitting.)
I've noticed that in source of this page the form action ad
Quoting Steven D'Aprano :
with top-posters subject to flaming. But
outside that world, I find top-posting to be the norm. I agree with
the logic of bottom-posting, because it is--well--logical, but cannot
hope to prevail.
Perhaps you mean interleaved or inline posting, as I've done here?
I
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 08:09:12PM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> The consensus on most technical lists I've seen is very strongly in
> favor of bottom posting,
Surely not. Bottom-posting is, if anything, worse than top-posting. With
top-posting at least you get to see the reply[1] at the top
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 4/2/2015 1:45 PM, J.B. Nicholson-Owens wrote:
I also think we should stop offering mailing list digests
Nobody forbids you as list administrator to stop offering digests on YOUR
lists. But why would you like to forbid digests to administrators and
u
15 matches
Mail list logo
