Re: [Mailman-Users] DMARC mitigation - was: Templates

2015-04-04 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 12:10 -0700, JB wrote: > I can hardly believe I actually followed that whole post start to end! > Thanks Mark. You might find the full discussion last spring of the DMARC issue both understandable and helpful. It went on for quite a while and a lot of very relevant points go

Re: [Mailman-Users] DMARC mitigation - was: Templates

2015-04-04 Thread JB
I can hardly believe I actually followed that whole post start to end! Thanks Mark. On Sat, 4/4/15, Mark Sapiro wrote: Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] DMARC mitigation - was: Templates To: mailman-users@python.org Date: Saturday, April 4, 2015, 1:38

Re: [Mailman-Users] Templates

2015-04-04 Thread JB
Actually I just a few seconds ago did some research and read about the upcoming 3.x series. I am encouraged by what I have been reading. I have been hearing rumblings about 3.x for a LONG time and hopefully cPanel will pick it up before too much longer once it is released. BTW I am a very pat

Re: [Mailman-Users] DMARC mitigation - was: Templates

2015-04-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 04/04/2015 09:59 AM, Laura Creighton wrote: > > ps -- anybody know why all mail I see from people on yahoo.com (including JB > here) arrives to me as from yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid. > > It very much seems to be a python.org thing, but, ah, why is python.org > seeing fit to add this stuff? It's

Re: [Mailman-Users] Templates

2015-04-04 Thread Laura Creighton
You need mailman 3.0. It will be released soon. After PyCON North America (in 2 weeks). I am not sure if everything you want will be in there, but most of it seems to be via a skinnable django mailman interface. Be a tiny bit more patient, install the new version, and, then get in on the ground

Re: [Mailman-Users] Templates

2015-04-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 04/04/2015 09:24 AM, JB wrote: > Well that kind of sucks. It would be pretty difficult (with my limited > python knowledge) to edit that code so that it generate a page skinned to > each client's web site. I really think this is the one glaring weakness with > MM. Not trying in any way wha

Re: [Mailman-Users] I'd prefer clients had collapsing features, not top-post; do away with mailing list digests

2015-04-04 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 11:26:34AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 4/3/2015 7:55 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 08:09:12PM -0700, David Benfell wrote: > >> with top-posters subject to flaming. But > >> outside that world, I find top-posting to be the norm. I agree with > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Templates

2015-04-04 Thread JB
Well that kind of sucks. It would be pretty difficult (with my limited python knowledge) to edit that code so that it generate a page skinned to each client's web site. I really think this is the one glaring weakness with MM. Not trying in any way what-so-ever to kick your cat by say that so

Re: [Mailman-Users] I'd prefer clients had collapsing features, not top-post; do away with mailing list digests

2015-04-04 Thread Tanstaafl
On 4/3/2015 7:55 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 08:09:12PM -0700, David Benfell wrote: >> with top-posters subject to flaming. But >> outside that world, I find top-posting to be the norm. I agree with >> the logic of bottom-posting, because it is--well--logical, but cann